Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
 Volume 63, Number 9, November 09, 2004
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Correspondence:
View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Neurology
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, K. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow All Ethics in Neurology/Legal issues
Right arrow Malpractice
Right arrow Professional conduct and ethics
NEUROLOGY 2004;63:1557-1558
© 2004 American Academy of Neurology
Contemporary Issues

Expert medical testimony

Responsibilities of medical societies

John M. Freeman, MD and Karin B. Nelson, MD

From the Department of Neurology (Dr. Freeman), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; and the Division of Neuroepidemiology (Dr. Nelson), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John M. Freeman, Meyer 2-147, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolf Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-7247; e-mail: Jfreeman{at}jhmi.edu

Expert witnesses for plaintiff and defense should be able to provide evidence-based literature to support their testimony in depositions and in the courtroom. Specialty societies, such as the American Academy of Neurology, should be willing to review complaints about unsubstantiated testimony and, at times, publicly discipline offending experts.

Received January 21, 2004. Accepted in final form June 19, 2004.

See also page 1555


Related articles in Neurology:

November 9 Highlights

Neurology 2004 63: 1550-1551. [Full Text]  

American Academy of Neurology policy on expert medical testimony
Murray G. Sagsveen
Neurology 2004 63: 1555-1556. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NeurologyHome page
January 10 Highlight and Commentary: The neurologist as expert witness
Neurology, January 10, 2006; 66(1): 1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
G. N. McAbee and J. M. Freeman
Expert medical testimony: Responsibilities of medical societies
Neurology, July 26, 2005; 65(2): 337 - 337.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
M. G. Sagsveen
American Academy of Neurology policy on expert medical testimony
Neurology, November 9, 2004; 63(9): 1555 - 1556.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Correspondence:

Read all Correspondence

Expert medical testimony: Responsibilities of medical societies
Gary N. McAbee, DO, JD
Neurology Online, 7 Mar 2005 [Full text]
Reply to McAbee
John M. Freeman
Neurology Online, 7 Mar 2005 [Full text]

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.