|
|
||||||||
From the Department of Neurology (Dr. Freeman), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; and the Division of Neuroepidemiology (Dr. Nelson), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John M. Freeman, Meyer 2-147, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolf Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-7247; e-mail: Jfreeman{at}jhmi.edu
Expert witnesses for plaintiff and defense should be able to provide evidence-based literature to support their testimony in depositions and in the courtroom. Specialty societies, such as the American Academy of Neurology, should be willing to review complaints about unsubstantiated testimony and, at times, publicly discipline offending experts.
Received January 21, 2004. Accepted in final form June 19, 2004.
See also page 1555
Related Articles
Neurology 2004 63: 1550-1551.
Neurology 2004 63: 1555-1556.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management Expert Witness Participation in Civil and Criminal Proceedings Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): 428 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
January 10 Highlight and Commentary: The neurologist as expert witness Neurology, January 10, 2006; 66(1): 1 - 1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. McAbee and J. M. Freeman Expert medical testimony: Responsibilities of medical societies Neurology, July 26, 2005; 65(2): 337 - 337. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Sagsveen American Academy of Neurology policy on expert medical testimony Neurology, November 9, 2004; 63(9): 1555 - 1556. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all Correspondence
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |