|
|
||||||||
From the Departments of Neurology (Dr. Subramony) and Preventive Medicine (Dr. May), University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson; Department of Neurology (Dr. Lynch), Childrens Hospital of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (Dr. Gomez), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Neurogenetics Branch (Dr. Fischbeck), NINDS (Dr. Hallett), NIH, Bethesda, MD; Departments of Neurology (Dr. Taylor) and Pathology (Dr. Wilson), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (Dr. Ashizawa), University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. S.H. Subramony, Department of Neurology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State Street, Jackson, MS 39216; e-mail: ssubramony{at}neurology.umsmed.edu
Measuring the severity of neurologic dysfunction in patients with inherited ataxias, including Friedreich ataxia (FA), is difficult because of the variable rate of progression, the variable age at onset and the variety of neural systems that may be affected. The authors discuss the problems related to rating scales in the ataxias, report a neurologic rating scale for FA, and demonstrate acceptable interrater reliability of the instrument.
Additional material related to this article can be found on the Neurology Web site. Go to www.neurology.org and scroll down the Table of Contents for the April 12 issue to find the title link for this article.
Supported by Friedreichs Ataxia Research Alliance (FARA).
Received May 3, 2004. Accepted in final form December 7, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Schmitz-Hubsch, P. Giunti, D. A. Stephenson, C. Globas, L. Baliko, F. Sacca, C. Mariotti, M. Rakowicz, S. Szymanski, J. Infante, et al. SCA Functional Index: A useful compound performance measure for spinocerebellar ataxia Neurology, August 12, 2008; 71(7): 486 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Rance, R. Fava, H. Baldock, A. Chong, E. Barker, L. Corben, and M. B. Delatycki Speech perception ability in individuals with Friedreich ataxia Brain, August 1, 2008; 131(8): 2002 - 2012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. du Montcel, P. Charles, P. Ribai, C. Goizet, A. Le Bayon, P. Labauge, L. Guyant-Marechal, S. Forlani, C. Jauffret, N. Vandenberghe, et al. Composite cerebellar functional severity score: validation of a quantitative score of cerebellar impairment Brain, May 1, 2008; 131(5): 1352 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Fahey, P. D. Cremer, S. T. Aw, L. Millist, M. J. Todd, O. B. White, M. Halmagyi, L. A. Corben, V. Collins, A. J. Churchyard, et al. Vestibular, saccadic and fixation abnormalities in genetically confirmed Friedreich ataxia Brain, April 1, 2008; 131(4): 1035 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R Maring and E. Croarkin Presentation and Progression of Friedreich Ataxia and Implications for Physical Therapist Examination Physical Therapy, December 1, 2007; 87(12): 1687 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M C Fahey, L Corben, V Collins, A J Churchyard, and M B Delatycki How is disease progress in Friedreich's ataxia best measured? A study of four rating scales J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2007; 78(4): 411 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Lynch, J. M. Farmer, A. Y. Tsou, S. Perlman, S. H. Subramony, C. M. Gomez, T. Ashizawa, G. R. Wilmot, R. B. Wilson, and L. J. Balcer Measuring Friedreich ataxia: Complementary features of examination and performance measures Neurology, June 13, 2006; 66(11): 1711 - 1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schmitz-Hubsch, S. T. du Montcel, L. Baliko, J. Berciano, S. Boesch, C. Depondt, P. Giunti, C. Globas, J. Infante, J. -S. Kang, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: Development of a new clinical scale Neurology, June 13, 2006; 66(11): 1717 - 1720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Ying, S. I. Choi, S. L. Perlman, R. W. Baloh, D. S. Zee, and A. W. Toga Pontine and cerebellar atrophy correlate with clinical disability in SCA2 Neurology, February 14, 2006; 66(3): 424 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |