Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minneboo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Castelijns, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minneboo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Castelijns, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow All Imaging
Right arrow MRI
Right arrow Multiple sclerosis
NEUROLOGY 2005;65:56-61
© 2005 American Academy of Neurology

Patterns of enhancing lesion evolution in multiple sclerosis are uniform within patients

A. Minneboo, MD, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, MD, H. J. Ader, PhD, F. Barkhof, MD, C. H. Polman, MD and J. A. Castelijns, MD

From the MR Center for MS Research (Drs. Minneboo, Barkhof, and Castelijns), Department of Radiology, Department of Neurology (Drs. Uitdehaag and Polman), and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs. Uitdehaag and Ader), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. A. Minneboo, Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, Post Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands; e-mail: a.minneboo{at}vumc.nl

Background: Histopathologic studies suggest that lesion development differs between patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but that all lesions appear similar within patients. It is unclear whether the same applies to the evolution of lesions on T1-weighted MRI.

Objective: To evaluate lesion evolution on MRI, comparing variance within and between patients, as well as the relationship between MRI lesion development and clinical characteristics.

Methods: In 48 patients, signal intensity at baseline and at follow-up on T1-weighted MRI of 789 newly enhancing lesions was studied in relationship with clinical data. Patients were included on the basis of showing at least five enhancing lesions that could be followed on monthly scans for 6 months. Variance component analysis and multilevel analysis were used to compare within-patient and between-patient variability.

Results: Although various types of lesion evolution could be observed within a single patient, between-patient variance was considerably larger than within-patient variance for MRI parameters used to describe lesion evolution, indicating that lesion evolution is a patient-specific phenomenon. Evolution of lesions in patients with secondary progressive disease more frequently followed a hypointense–hypointense pattern than in patients with relapsing–remitting disease (odds ratio 4.2). Patients with a benign disease course had more persistent isointense lesions at follow-up, whereas patients with aggressive disease had more hypointense lesions.

Conclusion: Lesion evolution on MRI appears to be a patient-specific phenomenon, although the outcome seems to vary according to the phase and severity of the disease.


Additional material related to this article can be found on the Neurology Web site. Go to www.neurology.org and scroll down the Table of Contents for the July 12 issue to find the title link for this article.

Dr. Minneboo is supported by a grant (98-348 MS) of the Dutch Foundation for the Support of MS Research. The MR Center for MS Research is supported by the Dutch Foundation for the Support of MS Research and VU University Medical Center.

Received October 19, 2004. Accepted in final form March 25, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. P. Amato, E. Portaccio, M. L. Stromillo, B. Goretti, V. Zipoli, G. Siracusa, M. Battaglini, A. Giorgio, M. L. Bartolozzi, L. Guidi, et al.
Cognitive assessment and quantitative magnetic resonance metrics can help to identify benign multiple sclerosis
Neurology, August 26, 2008; 71(9): 632 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
I. van den Elskamp, J Lembcke, V Dattola, K Beckmann, C Pohl, W Hong, R Sandbrink, K Wagner, D. Knol, B Uitdehaag, et al.
Persistent T1 hypointensity as an MRI marker for treatment efficacy in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, July 1, 2008; 14(6): 764 - 769.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
N. De Stefano, M. Battaglini, M. L. Stromillo, V. Zipoli, M. L. Bartolozzi, L. Guidi, G. Siracusa, E. Portaccio, A. Giorgio, S. Sorbi, et al.
Brain damage as detected by magnetization transfer imaging is less pronounced in benign than in early relapsing multiple sclerosis
Brain, August 1, 2006; 129(8): 2008 - 2016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.