|
|
||||||||
From Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M. Jones-Gotman, Montreal Neurological Institute, 3801 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4; e-mail: marilyn.jonesgotman{at}mcgill.ca
Background: The intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) is an important part of comprehensive investigation of patients who are candidates for surgical treatment of epilepsy. Owing to repeated and lengthy shortages of amobarbital, causing delays in elective surgery, attempts have been made to find a suitable alternative anesthetic. The authors report their experience using etomidate, a widely used agent for the induction of anesthesia.
Methods: Sixteen consecutive patients requiring IAP to evaluate memory or to lateralize speech underwent the procedure using etomidate. Prior to the procedure a catheter was placed in the internal carotid artery and an angiogram was performed. EEG was recorded and read online by an electroencephalographer. An anesthetist injected the drug, administered by bolus followed by an infusion, which was maintained until each speech measure had been sampled and new memory items had been introduced. The infusion was then stopped and testing continued as in a standard IAP.
Results: In all cases (30 hemispheres) contralateral hemiplegia followed injection. EEG slow waves were observed in every injected hemisphere, with some contralateral slowing anteriorly in 18. Global aphasia with preserved attention and cooperation followed dominant-hemisphere injections. These phenomena remained during infusion, and upon its termination returned gradually to baseline over a period of about 4 minutes.
Conclusions: Etomidate is a viable alternative to amobarbital, and its administration by bolus followed by infusion offers an improvement over the traditional intracarotid amobarbital procedure. Cognitive tests can be performed during an assured hemianesthesia of the injected hemisphere.
Editorial, see page 1692
See also page 1813
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Received April 21, 2005. Accepted in final form September 15, 2005.
Related articles in Neurology:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. L. Grote and K. Meador Has amobarbital expired?: Considering the future of the Wada Neurology, December 13, 2005; 65(11): 1692 - 1693. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |