| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
From the Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco. Dr. Miller is currently affiliated with Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. S. Claiborne Johnston, UCSF Neurology Box 0114, 505 Parnassus Ave, M-798, San Francisco, CA 94143-0114; e-mail: clay.johnston{at}ucsfmedctr.org
Background: The Babinski sign is a well-known sign of upper motor neuron dysfunction that is widely considered an essential element of a complete neurologic examination. Little is known about reliability and validity of this sign. A less well-known sign of upper motor neuron dysfunction, decreased speed of foot tapping, also has not been carefully evaluated. Scientific evaluation of findings of the physical examination is crucial in directing busy clinicians.
Methods: Ten physicians (five neurologists and five non-specialists) examined each foot of 10 subjects, 8 of whom had known unilateral upper motor neuron weakness, 1 had bilateral leg weakness secondary to ALS, and 1 had no known neurologic deficits. Our main outcome measures were inter-rater reliability (kappa values) and accuracy (agreement with known upper motor neuron weakness).
Results: The reliability of the Babinski sign was fair (kappa 0.30) and was substantial for foot tapping (kappa 0.73). Agreement with known weakness was 56% for Babinski sign and 85% for foot tapping. Reliability and accuracy for both tests were similar for neurologists and non-specialists.
Conclusions: The interobserver reliability and validity of the Babinski sign for identifying upper motor neuron weakness are limited. Slowness of foot tapping may be a more useful sign.
Commentary, see page 1147
Editorial, see page 1150
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Received March 1, 2005. Accepted in final form June 17, 2005.
Related articles in Neurology:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. E. Newman-Toker, J. C. Kattah, J. E. Alvernia, and D. Z. Wang Normal head impulse test differentiates acute cerebellar strokes from vestibular neuritis Neurology, June 10, 2008; 70(24_Part_2): 2378 - 2385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S. Wrobel and D. G. Armstrong Reliability and Validity of Current Physical Examination Techniques of the Foot and Ankle J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2008; 98(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Mitsumoto, A. M. Ulug, S. L. Pullman, C. L. Gooch, S. Chan, M. -X. Tang, X. Mao, A. P. Hays, A. G. Floyd, V. Battista, et al. Quantitative objective markers for upper and lower motor neuron dysfunction in ALS Neurology, April 24, 2007; 68(17): 1402 - 1410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Dyck, A. L. Dellon, V. Chaudhry, J. C. Stevens, J. Kincaid, and Y. T. So Practice advisory: utility of surgical decompression for treatment of diabetic neuropathy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology, March 6, 2007; 68(10): 796 - 796. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. van Gijn, M. Ronthal, B. O. Khatri, J. Bogousslavsky, S. R. Brenner, T. M. Miller, and S. C. Johnston Should the Babinski sign be part of the routine neurologic examination? Neurology, May 23, 2006; 66(10): 1607 - 1609. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Should We Bother to Look for the Babinski Sign? Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, April 21, 2006; 2006(421): 7 - 7. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Should We Bother to Look for the Babinski Sign? Journal Watch Neurology, January 26, 2006; 2006(126): 1 - 1. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. M. Landau Plantar reflex amusement: Misuse, ruse, disuse, and abuse Neurology, October 25, 2005; 65(8): 1150 - 1151. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all Correspondence
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
