Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kieburtz, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kieburtz, K.
NEUROLOGY 2006;66:S50-S57
© 2006 American Academy of Neurology

Neurology supplements are not peer-reviewed. Information contained in Neurology supplements represent the opinions of the authors and are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views of the American Academy of Neurology, Editor-in-Chief, or Associate Editors of Neurology.

Issues in neuroprotection clinical trials in Parkinson’s disease

Karl Kieburtz, MD, MPH

From the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Karl Kieburtz, University of Rochester, 1351 Mt. Hope Ave., Ste. 223, Rochester, NY 14620; e-mail: karl.kieburtz{at}ctcc.rochester.edu

Despite advances in understanding the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD), treatments that favorably influence the course of illness have remained elusive. In order to identify potentially neuroprotective interventions, improved clinical trial designs are needed. Researchers have to carefully consider what type of PD patients, how to measure the impact of putative neuroprotective agents, how to choose which interventions to study and what sequence of clinical trial designs is most appropriate. The possible use of futility studies to rapidly identify strongly ineffective agents and the use of delayed start designs to identify disease modifying interventions may both be important advances. Improved clinical trial design along with continued new insights into PD pathogenesis will likely lead to the identification of agents which can favorably influence the course of this disease.


Publication of this supplement was supported by an educational grant from Teva Neuroscience and Eisai, Inc.

Disclosure: The sponsor has provided the author with personal honoraria and grant support during his career.

Neurology supplements are not peer-reviewed. Information contained in Neurology supplements represents the opinions of the authors and is not endorsed by nor does it reflect the views of the American Academy of Neurology, Editorial Board, Editor-in-Chief, or Associate Editors of Neurology.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
C. Marras and A. Lang
Invited Article: Changing concepts in Parkinson disease: Moving beyond the Decade of the Brain
Neurology, May 20, 2008; 70(21): 1996 - 2003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.