Neurology®
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed Neurology journal
Quick Search
Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kobelt, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hadjimichael, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kobelt, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hadjimichael, O.
NEUROLOGY 2006;66:1696-1702
© 2006 American Academy of Neurology

Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis

A cross-sectional study in the United States Gisela Kobelt, PhD, Jenny Berg, MSc, Deborah Atherly, RPh, MPH and Olympia Hadjimichael, RPh, MPH

From the Karolinska Institute (G.K.), Stockholm, Sweden, and European Health Economics, France; Stockholm Health Economics (J.B.), Sweden; University of Washington (D.A.); and School of Medicine (O.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gisela Kobelt, European Health Economics, 492, Chemin des Laurens, F-06530 Speracedes, France; e-mail: gisela.kobelt{at}he-europe.com

Objective: To estimate current costs and quality of life (utility) of patients treated with disease modifying drugs (DMDs) in the United States, and to investigate the effect of disease severity on costs and utility.

Methods: Data on demographics, disease information, resource utilization (including work capacity), and utility were collected directly from patients in a cross-sectional postal survey. Patients were selected randomly among participants in the North American Committee on Multiple Sclerosis Patient Registry (NARCOMS) receiving DMDs. Mean annual costs per patient (2004 USD) and mean utilities for the sample and for different levels of functional disability are estimated from the societal perspective.

Results: The target answer rate of 50% was reached and 1,909 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 49 years and time since diagnosis was 13 years. A total of 10.5% of patients had primary progressive, 47.6% relapsing-remitting, and 33.3% secondary progressive disease. A total of 28.8% of patients indicated to have experienced a relapse during the past 3 months. Total average costs are estimated at $47,215 per patient and year. Of these, 53% were for direct medical and non-medical costs, 37% for production losses, and 10% for informal care. Mean utility in the sample was 0.698.

Conclusions: Consistent with other studies, costs and utilities were significantly correlated with functional capacity. The proportion of costs represented by disease modifying drugs is considerably lower than estimated in other studies, as all costs related to the disease are included.


Supported by an unrestricted grant from Schering AG, Berlin.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Received November 14, 2005. Accepted in final form February 28, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. A. Marrie, N. Yu, J. Blanchard, S. Leung, and L. Elliott
The rising prevalence and changing age distribution of multiple sclerosis in Manitoba
Neurology, February 9, 2010; 74(6): 465 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
F. E Munschauer III, R. H. Benedict, C. V Granger, and P. M Niewczyk
Introduction to Best practice recommendations for the selection and management of patients with MS on natalizumab
Multiple Sclerosis, November 1, 2009; 15(4_suppl): S1 - S6.
[PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
G Kobelt, B Texier-Richard, and P Lindgren
The long-term cost of multiple sclerosis in France and potential changes with disease-modifying interventions
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2009; 15(6): 741 - 751.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
G. Kraft, K. Johnson, K Yorkston, D Amtmann, A Bamer, C Bombardier, D Ehde, R Fraser, and H Starks
Setting the agenda for multiple sclerosis rehabilitation research
Multiple Sclerosis, November 1, 2008; 14(9): 1292 - 1297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
H Beckerman, I. van Zee, V de Groot, G. van den Bos, G. Lankhorst, and J Dekker
Utilization of health care by patients with multiple sclerosis is based on professional and patient-defined health needs
Multiple Sclerosis, November 1, 2008; 14(9): 1269 - 1279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. P. Thompson, K. Noyes, E. R. Dorsey, S. R. Schwid, and R. G. Holloway
Quantitative risk-benefit analysis of natalizumab
Neurology, July 29, 2008; 71(5): 357 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. M. Ransohoff
Natalizumab for Multiple Sclerosis
N. Engl. J. Med., June 21, 2007; 356(25): 2622 - 2629.
[Full Text] [PDF]