Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 16, 2005, doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000192262.29924.9e)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
01.wnl.0000192262.29924.9ev1
66/1_suppl_1/S30    most recent
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griggs, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griggs, R. C.
NEUROLOGY 2006;66:S30-S32
© 2006 American Academy of Neurology

The current status of treatment for inclusion-body myositis

Robert C. Griggs, MD, FAAN

From the Departments of Neurology, Medicine, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Robert C. Griggs, Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642; e-mail: Robert_Griggs{at}URMC.Rochester.edu

There is no established treatment that improves, arrests, or slows the progression of inclusion-body myositis (IBM). Many anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressant, or immunomodulating agents have been administered to patients with IBM but the design of clinical trials was such that it can only be concluded that none produced rapid improvement. The natural history of the disease is for stabilization or improvement in a third of patients for 6 months or more. Thus some agents that did not produce dramatic benefit may have been prematurely abandoned. However, because high-dose prednisone worsens strength while decreasing inflammation but increases amyloid accumulation, alternative targets for intervention and novel treatment strategies are needed.


This article was previously published in electronic format as an Expedited E-Pub at www.neurology.org.

Disclosure: Dr. Griggs receives support from the NINDS and the Office of Rare Diseases for Clincial Trials in Neuromuscular Diseases.

Received June 22, 2005. Accepted in final form October 14, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
V. Askanas and W. K. Engel
Inclusion-body myositis: A myodegenerative conformational disorder associated with A{beta}, protein misfolding, and proteasome inhibition
Neurology, January 24, 2006; 66(1_suppl_1): S39 - S48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
W. K. Engel and V. Askanas
Inclusion-body myositis: Clinical, diagnostic, and pathologic aspects
Neurology, January 24, 2006; 66(1_suppl_1): S20 - S29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.