Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geocadin, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geocadin, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, P. W.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
NEUROLOGY 2006;67:105-108
© 2006 American Academy of Neurology

Neurologic prognosis and withdrawal of life support after resuscitation from cardiac arrest

R. G. Geocadin, MD, M. M. Buitrago, MD, PhD, M. T. Torbey, MD, MPH, N. Chandra-Strobos, MD, M. A. Williams, MD and P. W. Kaplan, MBBS, FRCP

From the Departments of Neurology (R.G.G., M.B., M.A.W., P.W.K.), Neurosurgery (R.G.G., M.A.W.), and Anesthesiology–Critical Care Medicine (R.G.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore; The Phoebe R. Berman Bioethics Institute (M.A.W.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Department of Neurology (R.G.G., P.W.K.), Division of Cardiology (N.C.-S.), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; and Department of Neurology (M.T.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Romergryko G. Geocadin, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Meyer 8-140, Baltimore, MD 21287; e-mail: rgeocadi{at}jhmi.edi

Objective: To study the impact of neurologic prognostication on the decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapies (LST) in comatose patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest.

Methods: The authors prospectively studied a consecutive series of post-resuscitation comatose patients referred for neurologic prognostication at a single center for 4 years. For most patients, neurologic prognostication was not sought due to early death or rapid return to consciousness. Prognostication was based on Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) and Brainstem Reflex Score (BRS), with EEG and cortical evoked potentials (CEP), which were graded as benign, uncertain, and malignant. The outcomes were as follows: survivors (Group S), brain or cardiac death (Group D), and death from withdrawal of life sustaining therapy (Group W). In Group W, the time interval to withdrawal of LST was analyzed by EEG and CEP grades.

Results: Of 58 patients studied, 10 were in Group S, 8 in Group D, and 40 in Group W. Initial median GCS and BRS was similar for all groups with significant improvement noted in Group S, but not in Group D or Group W. In Group W, CEP grade correlated with the median duration of continued therapy before a decision to withdraw LST: 7 days for benign CEP, 2 days for uncertain CEP, and 1 day for malignant CEP, p = 0.0004.

Conclusion: In patients with poor neurologic recovery early after resuscitation from cardiac arrest, physicians appear to use the cortical evoked potential grade to estimate prognosis. Cortical evoked potential grade correlated with the waiting time until life sustaining therapies were withdrawn after no improvement in neurologic examination was seen.


Dr. Geocadin was supported in part by the Corporate Roundtable Fellowship Award of the American Academy of Neurology Education and Research Foundation and NIH-R01 HL71568.

Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Received August 25, 2005. Accepted in final form March 17, 2006.


Related Article

July 11 Highlights
Neurology 2006 67: 4-5. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. W. Neumar, J. P. Nolan, C. Adrie, M. Aibiki, R. A. Berg, B. W. Bottiger, C. Callaway, R. S.B. Clark, R. G. Geocadin, E. C. Jauch, et al.
Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Prognostication A Consensus Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, European Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Asia, and the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa); the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; and the Stroke Council
Circulation, December 2, 2008; 118(23): 2452 - 2483.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. W. Kaplan, Y. Morales, A. O. Rossetti, and G. Logroscino
STATUS EPILEPTICUS: AN INDEPENDENT OUTCOME PREDICTOR AFTER CEREBRAL ANOXIA
Neurology, April 8, 2008; 70(15): 1295 - 1296.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
Y Yanagawa, T Sakamoto, and Y Okada
Abnormal response of the extremities to pain stimulation immediately after the return of spontaneous circulation from cardiopulmonary arrest
Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 19 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
Practice Parameter: Outcome in Comatose Survivors of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Journal Watch Neurology, October 17, 2006; 2006(1017): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.