HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Correspondence: Submit a response Correspondence: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Adair, J. C. Articles by Corboy, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Adair, J. C. Articles by Corboy, J. R. Related Collections All Education

Survey of training programs’ means for promoting neurology and attracting trainees

From the Department of Neurology (J.C.A.), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center and New Mexico Veterans Healthcare System, Albuquerque; Department of Neurology (S.A.R.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; National Institutes of Health (E.B.), Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (W.J.W.), University of Maryland; Department of Neurology (P.K.C.), SUNY Stony Brook; and Department of Neurology (J.R.C.), University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center and Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John Adair, Department of Neurology, ACC 2nd Floor, University of New Mexico Hospital, 2211 Lomas Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131; e-mail: John.Adair{at}med.va.gov

Objective: To determine neurology training opportunities available to medical students and to define factors that influence program choice.

Methods: All neurology residency program directors and a random sample of residents were surveyed. Resident questions related to application, interview, and training experience. Directors’ questions focused on ways their department generated interest in clinical neurosciences.

Results: Medical schools introduce students to clinical neurology primarily through required clerkships. Contact time averages less than 4 weeks and emphasizes inpatient encounters. Preceptorships with neurology faculty do not exist at almost 40% of schools and only 14% have neuroscience tracks. Nearly all residency applicants matched their first or second choice. The majority declined at least one interview and 39% failed to rank at least one site they visited. When choosing where to apply, the programs’ reputation and geographic considerations were paramount. When making a rank list, interactions with faculty and residents at interview were most important. Residents generally reported satisfaction with their programs and attribute morale to supportive relationships with faculty and residents.

Conclusions: Neurology programs may be able to enhance students’ impression of neurology through changes in their clinical experience and development of venues for more meaningful relationships with faculty. Attention to the residents’ personal needs may increase the likelihood of matching the best available candidates and ensuring their satisfaction.

Additional material related to this article can be found on the Neurology Web site. Go to www.neurology.org and scroll down the Table of Contents for the September 26 issue to find the title link for this article.

Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Received November 23, 2005. Accepted in final form June 12, 2006.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. J. Stern, D. H. Lowenstein, and L. A. Schuh Invited article: Neurology education research Neurology, March 11, 2008; 70(11): 876 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. G. Preston, J. C. Adair, and J. R. Corboy Survey of training programs' means for promoting neurology and attracting trainees Neurology, April 17, 2007; 68(16): 1324 - 1324. [Full Text] [PDF]

Correspondence: