HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cohen, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cohen, J. A. Related Collections Volumetric MRI All Clinical trials Clinical trials Randomized controlled (CONSORT agreement) Multiple sclerosis

Randomized, double-blind, dose-comparison study of glatiramer acetate in relapsing–remitting MS

From the Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (J.A.C.), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.R., M.F.), Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology (A.D.G.), University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Teva Pharmaceuticals (D.L.), Petach Tiqva, Israel; and Consultants in Neurology (D.W.), Northbrook, IL.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jeffrey A. Cohen, Mellen Center U-10, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail: cohenj{at}ccf.org

Objective: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of glatiramer acetate (GA) 40 mg daily vs the approved 20-mg formulation in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis.

Methods: Eligibility criteria included clinically definite multiple sclerosis, Expanded Disability Status Scale score 0 to 5.0, no previous use of GA, at least one relapse in the previous year, and 1 to 15 gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions on a screening MRI. MRI was repeated at months 3, 7, 8, and 9, and neurologic examinations were performed at baseline and months 3, 6, and 9.

Results: Of 229 subjects screened, 90 were randomly assigned to GA 20 mg (n = 44) or 40 mg (n = 46). The groups were well matched at baseline for demographic, clinical, and MRI characteristics. The primary efficacy endpoint, total number of GdE lesions at months 7, 8, and 9, showed a trend favoring the 40-mg group (38% relative reduction, p = 0.0898). A difference between the two dose groups emerged as early as month 3 (52% reduction; p = 0.0051). There was a trend favoring the 40-mg group for relapse rate with benefit on proportion of relapse-free subjects (p = 0.0183) and time to first relapse (p = 0.0367). GA 40 mg was well tolerated, with an overall safety profile similar to that of 20 mg. Some features of injection site reactions and immediate postinjection reactions were more common and severe with the higher dose.

Conclusions: Glatiramer acetate (GA) 40 mg was safe and well tolerated. The overall efficacy results suggested that a 40-mg dose of GA may be more effective than the currently approved 20-mg daily dose in reducing MRI activity and clinical relapses.

Additional material related to this article can be found on the Neurology Web site. Go to www.neurology.org and scroll down the Table of Contents for the March 20 issue to find the title link for this article.

Disclosure: This study was funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals, of which Dr. Ladkani is an employee. The other authors have served as paid consultants or speakers for Teva Pharmaceuticals (less than $10,000 per year) and have received research support to their institutions, but none has a personal financial investment, ownership, equity, or other financial holdings. Preliminary results were presented at the annual meetings of the American Academy of Neurology in April 2006 in San Diego, CA, and the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis in September 2006 in Madrid, Spain.

Received June 7, 2006. Accepted in final form November 28, 2006.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Wiendl and R. Hohlfeld Multiple sclerosis therapeutics: Unexpected outcomes clouding undisputed successes Neurology, March 17, 2009; 72(11): 1008 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Coyle, B Arnason, B Hurwitz, and F Lublin Optimizing Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis - A Consensus Initiative Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2009; 15(2_suppl): S5 - S35. [Abstract] [PDF]