Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fins, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Foley, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fins, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Foley, K. M.
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:304-307
© 2007 American Academy of Neurology


Contemporary Issues

Late recovery from the minimally conscious state

Ethical and policy implications

Joseph J. Fins, MD, Nicholas D. Schiff, MD and Kathleen M. Foley, MD

From the Division of Medical Ethics (J.J.F.), Department of Neurology and Neuroscience (N.D.S., K.M.F.), Weill Medical College of Cornell University and Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center (K.M.F.), New York.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Fins, Division of Medical Ethics, New York Presbyterian–Weill Cornell Medical Center, 435 E. 70 St., Suite 4-J, New York, NY 10021; e-mail: jjfins{at}med.cornell.edu

We consider the ethical and public policy implications of late recovery from the minimally conscious state in light of an Institute of Medicine exploratory meeting convened to discuss current knowledge about disorders of consciousness as well as a recently published study demonstrating axonal regrowth in a patient two decades after traumatic injury. Participants at the meeting (which included the authors) described a lack of research initiatives for basic investigations of patients in these states, the frequent warehousing of patients following a diagnosis of persistent vegetative state that limits their access to appropriate neurologic and diagnostic tests, and the breadth of public confusion about disorders of consciousness. Meeting participants encouraged the Institute to pursue a more formal study to outline both the need for research and the unique opportunities to study consciousness, now available through the use of neuroimaging and related technologies. Areas of initial focus would be to define the epidemiology of the minimally conscious state, elucidate mechanisms of recovery, and identify clinically useful diagnostic and prognostic markers that will aid decision making at the bedside.


Supported by the Charles A. Dana Foundation (J.J.F. and N.D.S.) and the Buster Foundation (J.J.F.).

Disclosure: Drs. Fins and Schiff are the recipients of grant support from the Dana Foundation.

Received July 21, 2006. Accepted in final form October 19, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
N. D. Schiff, J. T. Giacino, and J. J. Fins
Deep Brain Stimulation, Neuroethics, and the Minimally Conscious State: Moving Beyond Proof of Principle
Arch Neurol, June 1, 2009; 66(6): 697 - 702.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. Laureys and J. J. Fins
Are we equal in death?: Avoiding diagnostic error in brain death
Neurology, January 22, 2008; 70(4): e14 - e15.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
J. J. Fins, M. G. Master, L. M. Gerber, and J. T. Giacino
The Minimally Conscious State: A Diagnosis in Search of an Epidemiology
Arch Neurol, October 1, 2007; 64(10): 1400 - 1405.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.