|
|
||||||||
From the Department of Neurology (D.M.W.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ; and Departments of Neurology (S.J.P., C.F.L., V.A.L., B.G.W.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (V.A.L., S.J.P.), and Immunology (V.A.L.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Dean M. Wingerchuk, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259; e-mail: wingerchuk.dean{at}mayo.edu
We compared the clinical course of 96 patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) to multiple sclerosis (MS) natural history data. Based on the distribution of follow-up data (median 6.1 year), we estimated that 21 NMO patients would convert to a secondary progressive course, but we observed only two conversions (p = 0.00002; relative risk = 0.08). The disparate natural histories of MS and NMO suggest dissociation between relapses and clinical progression in CNS demyelinating diseases.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Received August 24, 2006. Accepted in final form October 23, 2006.
Related Article
Neurology 2007 68: 540-541.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Giovannoni To test or not to test: NMO-IgG and optic neuritis Neurology, June 3, 2008; 70(23): 2192 - 2193. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Glisson and S. L. Galetta Is Neuromyelitis Optica Eyeing a Distinct Path From Multiple Sclerosis? Arch Ophthalmol, January 1, 2008; 126(1): 128 - 129. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Weinshenker, S. Galetta, J. Bennett, D. Kerr, and E. M. Frohman More on Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Reply Arch Neurol, December 1, 2007; 64(12): 1802 - 1803. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |