Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print July 18, 2007, doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000268485.93349.58)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
01.wnl.0000268485.93349.58v1
69/11/1142    most recent
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Correspondence:
View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saposnik, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saposnik, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow All Health Services Research
Right arrow Outcome research
Right arrow Stroke prevention
Right arrow Prognosis
Right arrow All Cerebrovascular disease/Stroke
Right arrow All epidemiology
NEUROLOGY 2007;69:1142-1151
© 2007 American Academy of Neurology

Hospital volume and stroke outcome

Does it matter?

G. Saposnik, MD, MSc, A. Baibergenova, MD, PhD, M. O'Donnell, MD, M. D. Hill, MD, MSc, M. K. Kapral, MD, MSc, V. Hachinski, MD, DSc On behalf of the Stroke Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group

From the Stroke Program (G.S., V.H.), Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Center, University of Western Ontario, Departments of Epidemiology (A.B.) and Medicine (M.O'D.), McMaster University, Hamilton, Departments of Medicine and Health Policy (M.K.K.), Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology (M.K.K.), University Health Network, Toronto, University Health Network Women's Health Program Toronto (M.K.K.), and Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (M.K.K.), Toronto, Ontario, Stroke Research Unit (G.S.), Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, and Stroke Unit (M.D.H.), Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Medicine, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. G. Saposnik, Director of Stroke Research Unit, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 55 Queen St. E, Suite 9-31, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 1R6 saposnikg{at}smh.toronto.on.ca

Background: Although hospital–outcome relationships have been explored for a variety of procedures and interventions, little is known about the association between annual stroke admission volumes and stroke mortality. Our aim was to determine whether facility type and hospital volume was associated with stroke mortality.

Methods: All hospital admissions for ischemic stroke were identified from the Hospital Morbidity database (HMDB) from April 2003 to March 2004. The HMDB is a national database that contains patient-level sociodemographic, diagnostic, procedural, and administrative information across Canada. Ischemic stroke was identified through patient's principal diagnosis recorded using the International Classification of Diseases (9 and 10). Multivariable analysis was performed with generalized estimating equations with adjustment for demographic characteristics, provider specialty, facility type, hospital volume, and clustering of observations at institutions.

Results: Overall, 26,676 patients with ischemic stroke were admitted to 606 hospitals. Seven-day stroke mortality was 7.6% and mortality at discharge was 15.6%. Adverse outcomes were more frequent in patients treated in low-volume facilities (<50 strokes/year) than in those treated in high volume facilities (100 to 199 and >200 strokes patients/year) (for 7-day mortality: 9.5 vs 7.3%, p < 0.001; 9.5 vs 6.0%, p < 0.001; for discharge mortality: 18.2 vs 15.2%, p < 0.001; 18.2 vs 12.8%, p < 0.001). The difference persisted after multivariable adjustment or when hospital volume was divided into quartiles.

Conclusions: High annual hospital volume was consistently associated with lower stroke mortality. Our study encourages further research to determine whether this is due to differences in case mix, more organized care in high-volume facilities, or differences in the performance or in the processes of care among facilities.


e-Pub ahead of print on July 18, 2007, at www.neurology.org.

Supported in part by a grant of the Heart Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC) and Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) given to Dr Gustavo Saposnik.

Disclosure: We declare that we participated in the study and that we have seen and approved the final version. The authors report no conflicts of interest. Drs. Saposnik and Baibergenova had full access to the data and conducted the statistical analysis. Dr. Martin O'Donnell is supported by a grant from the CIHR. Dr. Moira Kapral is supported by a New Investigator Award from the CIHR and also received support from the Canadian Stroke Network and the University Health Network Women's Health Program. Dr. Michael Hill is supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Alberta/NWT/NU and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. These grants were obtained based on competitive applications following publication of grant advertisements. The investigators acted as the sponsors of the study. None of the supporting agencies (HSFC, CSN, CIHR) had input on the design, access to the data, analyses, interpretation, or publication of the study.

Received December 6, 2006. Accepted in final form April 16, 2007.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Abilleira, M. Gallofre, A. Ribera, E. Sanchez, and R. Tresserras
Quality of In-Hospital Stroke Care According to Evidence-Based Performance Measures: Results From the First Audit of Stroke, Catalonia (Spain) 2005/2006
Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1433 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. H. Curtis, M. A. Greiner, B. G. Hammill, J. M. Kramer, D. J. Whellan, K. A. Schulman, and A. F. Hernandez
Early and Long-term Outcomes of Heart Failure in Elderly Persons, 2001-2005
Arch Intern Med, December 8, 2008; 168(22): 2481 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Saposnik, T. Jeerakathil, D. Selchen, A. Baibergenova, V. Hachinski, M. K. Kapral, and for the Stroke Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Wo
Socioeconomic Status, Hospital Volume, and Stroke Fatality in Canada
Stroke, December 1, 2008; 39(12): 3360 - 3366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Saposnik, M. D. Hill, M. O'Donnell, J. Fang, V. Hachinski, M. K. Kapral, and on behalf of the investigators of the Registry of
Variables Associated With 7-Day, 30-Day, and 1-Year Fatality After Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2318 - 2324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. M. Gordon and G. Saposnik
HOSPITAL VOLUME AND STROKE OUTCOME: DOES IT MATTER?
Neurology, February 19, 2008; 70(8): 657 - 657.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Correspondence:

Read all Correspondence

Hospital volume and stroke outcome: Does it matter?
James M Gordon
Neurology Online, 12 Oct 2007 [Full text]
Reply from the authors
Gustavo Saposnik
Neurology Online, 12 Oct 2007 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.