|
|
||||||||
From the Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Childrens Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Angus A. Wilfong, Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Texas Childrens Hospital, 6701 Fannin, Clinical Care Center, Suite 1250, Houston, TX awilfong{at}bcm.edu
An expanding array of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is available to treat childhood epilepsy, offering the potential for improved seizure control and quality of life in this important patient population but also providing challenges in the selection of the best regimen for the individual patient. In addition to correct diagnosis of seizure type and general AED efficacy profile, other important treatment considerations in pediatric patients include age-specific organ toxicity, potential cognitive and behavioral or psychiatric effects of AEDs, compliance, and drug-drug interactions, since children commonly receive more medications than nonelderly adults. Drug dosing may be more difficult in pediatric than in adult epilepsy patients, and doses in children often require adjustment as the patient matures. Because many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of newer AEDs have not included childhood epilepsy, physicians often have incomplete data on which to base treatment decisions. Therefore, despite the wider array of potential therapies, it is often unclear how to realize the potential they offer. Recently published guidelines from a number of organizations have provided strategies for the use of new AEDs in the treatment of childhood epilepsy. Additional RCTs of monotherapy options for childhood epilepsy are greatly needed. The ketogenic diet provides an alternative to pharmacologic control of seizures in some pediatric patients.
This supplement was supported by an educational grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Disclosure: Dr. Wilfong has received honoraria from the sponsor during the course of this study and grant support from the sponsor for research/activities not reported in this article.
Neurology® supplements are not peer-reviewed. Information contained in Neurology® supplements represents the opinions of the authors. These opinions are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views of the American Academy of Neurology, Editor-in-Chief, or Associate Editors of Neurology®.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |