Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, M. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Muscle disease
Right arrow All Clinical Neurology
Right arrow All clinical neurophysiology
Right arrow Prevalence studies
Right arrow Ion channel gene defects
NEUROLOGY 2008;70:50-53
© 2008 American Academy of Neurology

What causes paramyotonia in the United Kingdom?

Common and new SCN4A mutations revealed

E. Matthews, MRCP, S. V. Tan, MD, MRCP, D. Fialho, MRCP, M. G. Sweeney, BSc, R. Sud, PhD, A. Haworth, PhD, E. Stanley, PhD, G. Cea, MD, M. B. Davis, PhD and M. G. Hanna, FRCP

From the Medical Research Council Centre for Neuromuscular Disease, Department of Molecular Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Hanna, Medical Research Council Centre for Neuromuscular Disease, Department of Molecular Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK m.hanna{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk

Objective: To study the clinical and genetic features in a large cohort of UK patients with sodium channel paramyotonia congenita.

Methods: We conducted a UK-wide clinical and molecular genetic study of patients presenting with a phenotype suggestive of paramyotonia congenita.

Results: We identified 42 affected individuals (28 kindreds). All cases met our core criteria for a clinical diagnosis of paramyotonia congenita. Seventy-five percent of patients (32 patients/20 kindreds) had SCN4A mutations. Twenty-nine subjects from 18 kindreds had exon 22 and 24 mutations, confirming these exons to be hot spots. Unexpectedly, 3 of these subjects harbored mutations previously described with potassium-aggravated myotonia (G1306A, G1306E). We identified two new mutations (R1448L and L1436P). Ten cases (8 kindreds) without mutations exhibited paramyotonia congenita with prominent pain and weakness.

Conclusions: This study identifies two new mutations, confirms SCN4A as a common cause of paramyotonia congenita in the UK, and suggests further allelic and possibly genetic heterogeneity.

GLOSSARY: ADM = abductor digiti minimi; CMAP = compound motor action potential; hyper-PP/PMC = paramyotonia congenita with periodic paralysis; MF = myotonia fluctuans; MP = myotonia permanens; PAM = potassium-aggravated myotonia; PMC = paramyotonia congenita.


Supplemental data at www.neurology.org

Supported by the Medical Research Council UK and NIH through the NIH–Consortium for Clinical Investigation of Neurologic Channelopathies (NIH grant no. 1 U45 RR198442-01). This work was undertaken at University College London Hospitals/University College London, which received a proportion of funding from the Department of Health’s National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme.

Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Received November 28, 2006. Accepted in final form June 20, 2007.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.