HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: Volume 70, Number 3, January 15, 2008 Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bengtzen, R. Articles by Biousse, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bengtzen, R. Articles by Biousse, V. Related Collections Clinical neurology history All Neuro-ophthalmology Conversion Malingering

The "sunglasses sign" predicts nonorganic visual loss in neuro-ophthalmologic practice

From the Departments of Ophthalmology (R.B., M.W., N.J.N., V.B.), Neurology (N.J.N., V.B.), and Neurological Surgery (N.J.N.), Emory University School of Medicine; and Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University (M.J.L.), Atlanta, GA.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Valérie Biousse, Neuro-ophthalmology Unit, Emory Eye Center, 1365-B Clifton Rd., NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 vbiouss{at}emory.edu

Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate whether wearing sunglasses (the "sunglasses sign") can be used by neuro-ophthalmologists to predict nonorganic visual loss (NOVL) in their patients.

Methods: We prospectively collected information on all new patients seen by us over 13 months. We included all patients who ultimately received a diagnosis of NOVL, and all patients wearing sunglasses in our clinic. We recorded demographics, iris color, number of positive review of systems, ocular examination, precipitating event or trauma, workers’ compensation claims, disability and lawsuit related to the visual loss, and the reason for wearing sunglasses.

Results: Among the 1,377 consecutive new patients seen in our clinic during the study, 34 patients wore sunglasses, among whom 7 (20.6%) had organic visual loss. During the study period, 59 patients were diagnosed with NOVL, among whom 27 (45.8%) wore sunglasses. The sensitivity of wearing sunglasses for NOVL was 0.46 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.59). The probability that a patient walking into our clinic had NOVL was 0.043 (95% CI 0.033 to 0.055); it increased to 0.79 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.91) in sunglasses patients. The specificity of sunglasses for the diagnosis of NOVL was 0.995 (95% CI 0.989 to 0.998). At least one of the following characteristics (highly positive review of systems, workers’ compensation claim, disability, and lawsuit) was found in 26 of 27 (96.3%) of NOVL patients wearing sunglasses and in none of the sunglasses patients with organic neuro-ophthalmic disorders. All 7 sunglasses patients with organic neuro-ophthalmic disorders had reasonable ophthalmic explanations for wearing sunglasses.

Conclusion: The "sunglasses sign" in a patient without an obvious ophthalmic reason to wear sunglasses is highly suggestive of nonorganic visual loss.

Abbreviations: NOVL = nonorganic visual loss.

Supported in part by a departmental grant (Department of Ophthalmology) from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, NY, and by core grant P30-EY06360 (Department of Ophthalmology) from the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Newman is a recipient of a Research to Prevent Blindness Lew R. Wasserman Merit Award.

Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Received May 25, 2007. Accepted in final form June 27, 2007.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I Wear My Sunglasses Indoors Journal Watch Neurology, April 22, 2008; 2008(422): 4 - 4. [Full Text]