HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hornberger, M. Articles by Hodges, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hornberger, M. Articles by Hodges, J. R. Related Collections Prognosis Neuropsychological assessment Executive function Frontotemporal dementia

Executive function in progressive and nonprogressive behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

From Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute (M.H., O.P., J.R.H.), Sydney, Australia; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (C.K., J.R.H.), University of Cambridge, UK and MRC-Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (J.R.H.), Cambridge, UK.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John R. Hodges, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia j.hodges{at}powmri.edu.au

Background: Recent studies suggest that behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD) patients differ in their prognosis with fast-progressing and very slow–progressing cases. We investigated executive and behavioral profiles of progressive and nonprogressive bv-FTD patients to establish diagnostic markers discriminating the two groups.

Methods: A range of neuropsychological and behavioral tests were used. Mean overlap-based statistical analyses and logistic regression analyses were performed to distinguish progressive from nonprogressive bv-FTD cases.

Results: Although progressors and nonprogressors showed similar behavioral profiles, they were distinguishable by their performance on executive tasks. The nonprogressors’ performance on all tests was with the normal range, whereas the progressors were consistently impaired on four tests: Digit Span Backward, Hayling Test of inhibitory control, Letter Fluency, and Trails B. Logistic regression showed that 86% of patients could be classified on the basis of Digit Span and Hayling subscores.

Conclusions: Contrary to some prior reports, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD) patients who progress over time are typically impaired on executive tasks at first presentation, although an important minority of true FTD patients perform normally. Previous inconsistencies are explicable by the mixture of patients with progressing FTD and phenocopy cases.

Abbreviations: ACE = Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination; AD = Alzheimer disease; BADS = Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome; bv-FTD = behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; CBI = Cambridge Behavioral Inventory; FTD = frontotemporal dementia; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; NPI = Neuropsychiatric Inventory; NS = not significant.

Supported by a Medical Research Council program grant to J.R.H. O.P. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Career Development Award Fellowship (no. 510184).

Disclosure: The authors report no disclosures.

Received May 8, 2008. Accepted in final form July 24, 2008.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Piguet, M. Hornberger, B. P. Shelley, C. M. Kipps, and J. R. Hodges Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia Neurology, February 24, 2009; 72(8): 732 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. D. Huey, E. N. Goveia, S. Paviol, M. Pardini, F. Krueger, G. Zamboni, M. C. Tierney, E. M. Wassermann, and J. Grafman Executive dysfunction in frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal syndrome Neurology, February 3, 2009; 72(5): 453 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]