Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aurora, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aurora, S. K.
NEUROLOGY 2009;72:S8-S13
© 2009 American Academy of Neurology

Spectrum of illness

Understanding biological patterns and relationships in chronic migraine

Sheena K. Aurora, MD

From the Swedish Pain and Headache Center, Seattle, Washington.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sheena K. Aurora, MD, Swedish Pain and Headache Center, 1101 Madison Street, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98104 sheena.aurora{at}swedish.org

Chronic migraine (CM) typically evolves from episodic migraine (EM) over months to years in susceptible individuals. Headaches increase in frequency over time, becoming less intense but more disabling and less responsive to treatment. The results of electrophysiologic and functional imaging studies indicate that CM is associated with abnormalities in the periaqueductal gray matter that may be progressive. In addition, CM is associated with a greater degree of impairment in cortical processing of sensory stimuli than EM, perhaps because of more pervasive or persistent cortical hyperexcitability. These findings fit with the model of migraine as a spectrum disorder, in which the clinical and pathophysiologic features of migraine may progress over time. This progression is postulated to result from changes in nociceptive thresholds and ensuing central sensitization caused by recurrent migraine in susceptible individuals, for whom risk factors have been described. Also, progression may lead to changes in baseline neurologic function between episodes of headache, evident in electrophysiologic and functional imaging studies and as an increase in depression, anxiety, nonhead pain, fatigue, gastrointestinal disorders, and other somatic complaints that may occur after years of EM. From the available research and migraine models, a concept of CM is emerging that identifies relatively permanent and pervasive central changes warranting novel, tolerable treatments. This model also implies that prevention of CM is an important goal in the management of EM, particularly for individuals who exhibit risk factors for chronic transformation.


Jointly sponsored by the Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower and CogniMed Inc. This program is supported by an independent educational grant provided by Allergan, Inc.

Disclosure: S.K.A. has received grants and research support from Advanced Bionics Corporation, Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Allergan, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Neuroalieve Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. She has served as a consultant for Allergan, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Neuroalieve Inc., Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Pfizer Inc. She has received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co., Inc., Neuroalieve Inc., Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Pfizer Inc.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.