|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of Neurosurgery (Drs. Mikuni, Takayama, Satow, Yamada, Hayashi, Nishida, Taki, Enatsu, Miyamoto, and Hashimoto) and Neurology (Ikeda), Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mikunin{at}kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Abstract-- The authors evaluated adverse effects of intracarotid propofol injection during a Wada test and their risk factors in 58 patients. Nineteen patients had an adverse effect, mostly in patients receiving more than 10 mg. For patients older than age 55 years or those requiring an injection dose greater than 20 mg to produce hemiplegia, propofol should be injected slowly and patients monitored for excitatory movements.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Lao, H. Nie, L. X. Xu, L. Z. Xiong, H. Zhang, Y. Y. Fan, and B. R. Wang Efficacy of intracarotid propofol infusion and impact of cerebral blood flow alteration Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2009; 102(2): 234 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Grote and K. Meador Has amobarbital expired?: Considering the future of the Wada Neurology, December 13, 2005; 65(11): 1692 - 1693. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |