Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. D., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Arteriovenous malformation
Right arrow Clinical trials Methodology/study design
NEUROLOGY 2006;67:1630-1634
© 2006 American Academy of Neurology

Use of the Modified Rankin Scale to assess outcome after arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery

Bruce E. Pollock, MD and Robert D. Brown, Jr, MD

From the Departments of Neurological Surgery (B.E.P.), Radiation Oncology (B.E.P.), and Neurology (R.D.B.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Bruce E. Pollock, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: pollock.bruce{at}mayo.edu

Objective: To present the results of arteriovenous malformation (AVM) radiosurgery using the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) as the primary outcome measure and to analyze whether previous AVM rupture or other factors have an effect on outcomes after AVM radiosurgery.

Methods: We reviewed outcomes after AVM radiosurgery for 243 patients from 1990 and 2001. The mean follow-up after radiosurgery was 65 months.

Results: Forty-one patients (17%) sustained a decline in MRS (median –2) after AVM radiosurgery. We noted a decline in MRS in 4% of patients 1 year after radiosurgery, 8% of patients at 3 years after radiosurgery, and 15% of patients at 7 years after radiosurgery. The radiosurgery-based AVM score correlated with a decline in MRS after AVM radiosurgery in multivariate testing (odds ratio 2.1; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.6; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Previous AVM rupture did not influence neurologic deterioration after AVM radiosurgery. The radiosurgery-based AVM score predicted the chance of a worse MRS after radiosurgery.


Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Received January 9, 2006. Accepted in final form July 6, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Stapf and J.P. Mohr
Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Should Be Treated Conservatively: Yes
Stroke, December 1, 2007; 38(12): 3308 - 3309.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.