Advertisement
Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text article. You must be a current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published Correspondence.

Correspondence to:

VIEWS & REVIEWS:
David Goldblatt
A messy necessary end: Health care proxies need our support
Neurology 2001; 56: 148-152 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*Correspondence:
  Submit a response to this article

Correspondence published:

[Read Correspondence] The advance directive: A morally-sanctioned document or an ethical stumbling block?
P Pullicino, "C Henry, W J Burke"   (15 March 2001)

The advance directive: A morally-sanctioned document or an ethical stumbling block? 15 March 2001
  Top
P Pullicino,
neurologist
SUNY at Buffalo,
"C Henry, W J Burke"

Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: The advance directive: A morally-sanctioned document or an ethical stumbling block?

ppullici{at}acsu.buffalo.edu P Pullicino, et al.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
Advertisement