Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS:
Michael von Brevern, Andrew H. Clarke, and Thomas Lempert
Continuous vertigo and spontaneous nystagmus due to canalolithiasis of the horizontal canal
Neurology 2001; 56: 684-686
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
michael.von_brevern{at}charite.de Michael von Brevern, et al.
We thank Dr. Leigh for his comment on our case report. Dr. Leigh and
colleagues have found that vertical eye drift can be a physiological
phenomenon that depends on head position and is thus influenced by
otolithic input(1). We would like to draw attention to another recent
study (2) which demonstrated the occurence of positional vertical
nystagmus in a large group of normal subjects with slow phase velocities
even exceeding 5°/s in some subjects. However, one has to bear in mind
that eye movement recordings in these studies and in our report were
performed in darkness which completely inhibits fixation suppression.
Therefore, in clinical practice, pure vertical positional nystagmus
observed with or without Frenzel glasses should still raise the suspicion
of a central vestibular lesion.
1. Kim JI, Somers JT, Stahl JS, Bhidayasiri R, Leigh RJ. Vertical
nystagmus: Effects of head position, scopolamine, and nicotine. Neurology
2000; 54 (Suppl3): A169-170 (Abstract).
2. Bisdorff AR, Sancovic S, Debatisse D, Bentley C, Gresty MA,
Bronstein MA. Positional nystagmus in the dark in normal subjects. Neuro-
ophthalmology 2000; 24, 283-290.
Nystagmus with canalith jam
10 April 2001
R John Leigh, Neurology Case Western Reserve University
I congratulate Drs. von Brevern, Clarke and Lempert for an excellent
example of interpretation of clinical signs, in this fascinating case,
using current knowledge of vestibular physiology and anatomy. The clarity
of their account make this a superb teaching case. With respect to the
direction of their patient's nystagmus, described in the final paragraph
of their report, the vertical component might be because: (1) the lateral
canals show substantial variation in their position from subject to
subject (see variance of data in the classic study by Blanks and
colleagues) so that stimulation of them may be expected to produce
vertical eye movements; (2) "physiological vertical eye drift" in darkness
in normal subjects may be otolithic in origin. We have recorded drifts of
the eyes (search coil) in darkness in four subjects first with their head
erect and then head inverted for several minutes. Three subjects showed
low-amplitude brow-beating nystagmus with their head erect while all four
showed chin-beating nystagmus with their heads inverted (Kim et al, 2000;
2001). These findings suggest a normal, physiological change in otolithic
inputs brought about by the static head orientation
Blanks RHI, Curthoys IS, Markham CH. Planar relationships of the
semicircular canals in man. Acta Otolaryngol 1975;80:185-196.
Kim JI, Somers JT, Stahl JS, Bhidayasiri R, Leigh RJ. Vertical
Nystagmus: Effects of Head Position, Scopolamine, and Nicotine. Neurology
2000; 54 (Suppl3): A169-70 (Abstract).
Kim JI, Somers JT, Stahl JS, Bhidayasiri R, Leigh RJ. Vertical
nystagmus in normal subjects: effects of head position, nicotine and
scopolamine. J Vestibular Res (2001, in press).