Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS:
Danielle J. Tisserand, Hans Bosma, Martin P.J. Van Boxtel, and Jelle Jolles
Head size and cognitive ability in nondemented older adults are related
Neurology 2001; 56: 969-971
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
We acknowledge that relating anthropometric measures to mental
abilities is a charged research topic. Too often, human history has shown
that associating intellectual abilities or personality characteristics
with individual differences in physical appearance can lead to
discrimination of certain groups of people. However, the purpose of our
study was to investigate the relationship
between head size and cognitive performance in elderly subjects while
explicitly adjusting for individual differences (e.g. age, sex, and
education). Race was no issue here as all participants were Caucasian.
Furthermore, neither height nor socioeconomic background (assumed to
reflect nutritional and other developmental factors early in life)
significantly influenced the head size cognition associations which we
found.
While leaving aside the discussion of whether it is plausible to
suggest the existence of a relationship between a global measure such as
head size and specific mental abilities, the consistency of the findings
are remarkable. In studies with demented patients, a relationship between
head or brain size and disease severity has been reported repeatedly. [2,
3, 4] This
head size cognition association, albeit small, also seems to apply to
healthy elderly individuals. [1, 5] As described in our paper, these
studies have been taken as evidence for a brain reserve hypothesis, that
is, larger brains may provide a buffer against cognitive deterioration.
References:
1) Tisserand DJ, Bosma H, Van Boxtel MPJ, Jolles J. Head size and
cognitive ability in nondemented older adults are related. Neurology
2001;56:969-971.
2) Graves AB, Mortimer JA, Larson EB, Wenzlow A, Bowen JD, Mc Cormick
WC. Head circumference as a measure of cognitive reserve. Association
with severity of impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Br J Psychia
1996;169:86-92.
3) Mori E, Hirono N, Yamashita et al. Premorbid brain size as a
determinant of reserve capacity against intellectual decline in
Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychia 1997;154:18-24.
4) Schofield PW, Logroscino G, Andrews HF, Albert S, Stern Y. An
association between head circumference and Alzheimer's disease in a
population-based study of aging and
dementia. Neurology 1997;49:30-37.
5) Reynolds MD, Johnston JM, Dodge HH, DeKosky ST, Ganguli M. Small
head size is related to low Mini-Mental State Examination scores in a
community sample of nondemented
older adults. Neurology 1999;53:228-229.
Head size and cognitive ability in nondemented older adults are related
19 July 2001
I Steiner Hadassah University Hosptial Jerusalem Israel, J P Newman
We read with much interest and a certain aura of deja' vu the report
by Tisserand et al [1] on the relationship between head size and cognitive
ability. Beyond issues such as differential average size of the brains of
men and women or the science of phrenology and other theories on the
association between head structure and personality [2, 3], this work
brings to mind the story of Paul Broca's claim that brain size is
associated with intelligence.[4] His theory was based in part on the post
mortem of George Curvier, the founder of paleontology, who was found to
possess a very large brain (weighing 1830 gm). As no measures of the
skull were taken, the hat of the scientist was located and presented as
circumstantial evidence for his enormous head, (and brain) size.
Nevertheless, the assertion that the head size of Curvier was due to
arrested hydrocephalus could not be disproved so the evidence was
dismissed.
Ever since 1861 when Broca was occupied with this scientific strife
until lately when new information on Albert Einstein's brain hit the
tabloids and the scientific community,5 the size of brains has been a
juicy item (Turgenev's brain weighed more than 2000 gm, while Anatole
France's weighed in at only 1017 gm4). However, prior to concluding that
size does matter, and Paul Broca might have been, at the end of the day,
right, this report does not detail how head size was corrected for body
weight, individual height, nutrition and gender, as well as race.
Therefore, we think that any conclusion from this report should be
regarded with some caution.
References:
1) Tisserand DJ, Bosma H, Van Boxtel MP, Jolles J. Head size and
cognitive ability in nondemented older adults are related. Neurology.
2001;56:969-71.
2) Hoff TL. Gall's psychophysiological concept of function: the rise
and decline of "internal essence". Brain Cogn. 1992;20:378-98.
3) Liberini P, Spano P. From the mind to the brain: an unusual
pathway. J Hist Neurosci. 2000;9:41-5.
4) Gould SJ. The Panda's Thumb. More reflections in natural history.
Penguin Books, London, 1980.
5) Witelson SF, Kigar DL, Harvey T. The exceptional brain of Albert
Einstein. Lancet. 1999;353:2149-53.