Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS:
Terence J. OBrien, Frances M. Meara, Helen Matthews, and Frank J. Vajda
Prospective study of local cutaneous reactions in patients receiving IV phenytoin
Neurology 2001; 57: 1508-1510
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
sandi_moriarity{at}urmc.rochester.edu Terence J O'Brien, et al.
We thank Drs. Burneo and Barkley for their interest in our article.
[1] We note that they found an incidence of the purple glove syndrome
(PGS) of three (not two) of 179 exposures in their recently published
prospective study. [2]. We agree that local practices are likely to
influence the rate of reactions following IV phenytoin administration,
particularly as they relate to the risk of extravasation of the highly
irritant solution. The slow rate of infusion (20 mg/min) dictated at their
hospital may well have contributed to the low rate of the PGS that they
found. In contrast, at our hospital the infusions could be administered up
to 50 mg/min, and the actual rate of administration was rarely recorded.
Differences in the patient populations may have also been a contributing
factor, with our patients being older (median age 65 years vs 57 years)
and therefore potentially more vulnerable to developing IV extravasations.
[4]
We also agree that differences in terminology and definition may also be
important. The site of the edema, discoloration and pain complicating IV
phenytoin infusions is dependant on the site its administration, and in
many cases will be prominent proximally in the forearm or arm rather than
distally in the hand, as in the classic PGS. For this reason we preferred
the site independent term “LCR”, rather that attempting to rather
arbitrarily classify reactions as being the “PGS” according to their site.
Burneo et al. [2] classified reactions as being the “PGS” only when they
occurred “distal to the IV site”. Of interest, their incidence per
exposure (1.7%) was similar to that of our previous retrospective study
from the Mayo Clinic (9/6/77, 1.3%), where a more strict definition of the
“PGS” was used. [3]. However, we dispute that the LCR reported in our
current study represented non-specific reactions related to direct trauma,
uncomplicated fluid extravasation, infection or age related changes. To be
classified as a LCR the reactions needed to have discoloration as well as
edema, to be present within 24 hours of the infusion and to have
progressed after the commencement of the infusion, all features that would
not be expected with any of the above alternate explanations. Furthermore,
as a comparison group we prospectively examined the limbs of 16 general
ward patients who were given IV benzodiazepines during the last four
months of our study (mean age 53 years vs. 65 years for the phenytoin
patients, p=0.27, Student t-test), with no cases fulfilling the criteria
for a phenytoin LCR being detected.
References:
1. O’Brien TJ, Meara FM, Matthews H, Vajda FJ. Prospective study of
local cutaneous reactions in patients receiving IV phenytoin. Neurology
2001;57:1508-1510.
2. Burneo JG, Ananda JV, Barkley GL. A prospective study of the
incidence of the purple glove syndrome. Epilepsia 2001;42:1156-1159.
3. O'Brien TJ, Cascino GD, So EL, Hanna DR. Incidence and Clinical
Consequences of the Purple-Glove Syndrome in Patients Receiving
Intravenous Phenytoin. Neurology 1998;51:1034-1039.
4. MacCara ME. Extravasation: A hazard of intravenous therapy. Drug
Intell Clin Pharm 1983;17:713-717.
Prospective study of local cutaneous reactions in patients receiving IV phenytoin
14 November 2001
Jorge G Burneo University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Al, Gregory L Barkley
sandi_moriarity{at}urmc.rochester.edu Jorge G Burneo, et al.
We read with interest the work by O’Brien et al. [1] since we have
recently published a prospective study of the purple glove síndrome (PGS).
[2] The differences in rate of localized cutaneous reactions (LCR) in
their series and ours may be due to several factors. The high incidence
of LCR in their series (25.2%) may be related to the rate of infusión of
phenytoin on different hospital services. At Henry Ford Hospital, the
rate of administration is dictated by the Department of Pharmacy and is
set at no more than 20 mg/min throughout the hospital , including the
Department of Emergency Medicine. [2]
The reported rates of cutaneous reactions in this report do not
directly compare to our series where we reported only the rate of PGS.
The authors of this study have combined the rates of PGS with other
cutaneous reactions. They do not differentiate between PGS and local
inflammation as a result of direct trauma of the vein due to a catheter
insertion, intravenous fluid extravasation, and local cutaneous infection.
In our series, only two exposures out of 179 developed PGS. This
small incidence makes us reluctant to say that the rate of PGS is elevated
in the elderly. We suspect that the increased incidence of cutaneous
findings in the elderly in this report is a non-specific phenomenon of
aging due to the known changes in the skin that occur with increasing age
rather than a specific cutaneous reaction to phenytoin. We would be
interested to see the PGS rates separated from other cutaneous skin
findings. In addition, we wonder if O’Brien et al. have any data on the
rates of these other non-specific skin reactions in an age-matched control
group in their hospital.
References:
1. O’Brien TJ, Meara FM, Matthews H, Vajda FJ. Prospective study of
local cutaneous reactions in patients receiving IV phenytoin. Neurology
2001; 57: 1508-1510.
2. Burneo JG, Ananda JV, Barkley GL. A prospective study of the
incidence of the purple glove syndrome. Epilepsia 2001; 42 (9): 1156-1159.