One of the primary end-points chosen in our study is bone mineral
density (BMD), because it is a very powerful predictor of fracture risk as
demonstrated in many cross-sectional and longitudinal studies from the US
and Europe. Although we have demonstrated in a population-based study that
peak BMD is slightly lower in Lebanese compared to American subjects, we
have warned against the use of the local database until validated. [1] It
is for those reasons that we avoided the use of a local database in our
study. [2]
Firstly, the WHO definition of osteoporosis using bone mineral density
(BMD) derived T-scores only applies to Western Caucasian BMD databases
[3], the database in which the WHO T-score cut-offs were established, and
the population in whom the BMD-fracture relationship is validated. No such
validation is yet available in our population, and although we are in the
process of conducting such study, until its results are available, the use
of local databases would be flawed. Indeed, it is for these reasons that
the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) recommends the use of
established universal databases. [4]
Secondly, it is reasonable to expect the BMD-fracture relationship is the
same in Caucasians whether they are American, European or Lebanese. In
fact, the IOF recommends the American NHANES III database as an
international reference for hip T-score calculation and fracture risk
estimates. [4] Furthermore, we have demonstrated mean BMD in Lebanese and
American patients with hip fractures to be very similar. [5]
Thirdly, let us consider applying the approach suggested by McCorry to the
cholesterol-coronary artery disease analogy in our population. Lebanese
subjects have higher mean cholesterol level than western counterparts.
The argument presented by McCorry would imply that we should adjust the
universally recognized NCEP cholesterol thresholds for intervention
upwards taking into local “normative databases”. This would be an
unwarranted.
Contrary to what McCorry suggested, the inverse relationship in adults
between BMD at the total body, total hip and trochanter and duration of
anti-epileptic drug therapy is not due to age. The R values we reported
between these variables varied between –0.38—0.45 and exceeded those known
to correlate BMD and age, in the age range studied. In our study, the
correlation between age and BMD was weaker and only significant at the
trochanter. Finally, linear regression analyses revealed that duration of
anti-epileptic drug use, and not age, was a significant correlate of BMD
at the three skeletal sites.
The results and conclusions presented in our study are indeed solid and
justified. However, as we discussed, the ultimate evidence for
understanding the impact of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs on skeletal
health would only be attained by conducting randomized trials. [2]
References
1. El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Baddoura R, Awada H, Salam N, Salamoun M, Rizk
P. Low peak bone mineral density in healthy Lebanese subjects. Bone 2002;
31:520-8.
2. Farhat G, Yamout B, Mikati MA, Demirjian S, Saway R, El-Hajj Fuleihan
G. Effect of antiepilectic drugs on bone density in ambulatory patients.
Neurology
2002;58: 1348-1353.
3. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for
postmenopausal osteoporosis Report of a WHO study group. WHO technical
report series 1994; 843:1-129.
4. Kanis JA, Gluer CC for the Committee of Scientific Advisors,
International Osteoporosis Foundation. An update on the diagnosis and
assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11:
192-202.
5. El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Badra M, Tayim A, Makari M, Salamoun M, Afeiche N,
Baddoura O, Boulos S, Haidar R, Lakkis S, Musharrafieh R, Nsouli A, Taha
A. Lebanese patients with hip fractures are relatively young, but have
osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2001; Suppl 1: Abstract M 337.