Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
-
- ARTICLES:
D. M. Green, A. H. Ropper, R. A. Kronmal, B. M. Psaty, and G. L. Burke
- Serum potassium level and dietary potassium intake as risk factors for stroke
Neurology 2002; 59: 314-320
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Correspondence published:
-
Serum potassium level and dietary potassium intake as risk factors for stroke
- Silvia Di Legge, J David Spence, Arturo Tamayo, and Vladimir Hachinski
(1 April 2003)
-
Reply to Letter to the Editor
- Deborah M Green, Allen H Ropper, Richard A Krommal, Bruce M Psaty and Gregory L Burke for The Cardiovascular Health Study
(26 November 2002)
-
Serum potassium level and dietary potassium intake as risk factors for stroke
- Robert G Hart, Lesly A Pearce
(18 November 2002)
|
Serum potassium level and dietary potassium intake as risk factors for stroke |
1 April 2003 |
|
|
Silvia Di Legge UWO Canada, J David Spence, Arturo Tamayo, and Vladimir Hachinski
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Serum potassium level and dietary potassium intake as risk factors for stroke
sdilegge{at}uwo.ca Silvia Di Legge, et al.
|
Interestingly, Green et al. [1] observed an increased incidence of
stroke in the elderly with potassium depletion, after adjustment for
vascular risk factors, including hypertension.
Detection and management of hypertension remains an unsolved problem:
over one half of the population aged 65 or older have hypertension, but
fewer than 20% have their blood pressure controlled [2]. The interaction
between hypertension, drug effects on ion balance and the risk of stroke
is complex; an approach that simplifies this problem is to determine the
physiological drivers causing hypertension in the individual patient. Most
patients with resistant hypertension have hyperaldosteronism; the key is
sorting it out into primary or secondary. Stimulated plasma
renin/aldosterone profiling helps determine whether the problem is primary
or secondary hyperaldosteronism, but remains underutilized by most
physicians initiating antihypertensive treatment. In primary
hyperaldosteronism, an excess of adrenocortical hormones may cause low
renin hypertension. Adrenocortical hyperplasia is probably more common
than Conn's syndrome [3].
Excess aldosterone is responsible per se for salt and water retention
and loss of potassium, magnesium and other ions. Patients with low-renin
hypertension require diuretics for treatment, but they experience more
adverse effects from thiazides because of additional depletion of
potassium and other ions. In these cases, a reduction in sodium intake and
low-dose thiazides in combination with potassium/magnesium sparing
diuretics is more efficacious in preventing potassium depletion.
Conversely, angiotensin II antagonists or angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibitors may prevent potassium depletion in patients with secondary
hyperaldosteronism, identified by a high renin level. Spence [3] observed
that stimulated plasma renin profiling is an efficient way to tailor
therapy in patients with resistant hypertension and that adrenocortical
hyperplasia is much more common in blacks.
A new important cause of low-renin hypertension is a sodium channel
polymorphism that accounts for 5% of hypertension in blacks, and is
treated specifically with amiloride [4]. In this, and in having low levels
of both renin and aldosterone, it resembles Liddle's syndrome.
Interestingly, in Green et al study, the highest proportion of African
Americans (20%) was observed in the group of patients at increased risk of
stroke among those with low serum potassium levels and hypertension,
mostly treated with diuretics.
Stimulated plasma renin/aldosterone profiling can be done without
withdrawing other antihypertensive therapy; using that approach, 15% of
patients referred to a hypertension clinic had primary aldosteronism [5].
Thus measuring the renin and aldosterone define three groups of
hypertensives, requiring different therapy (Table 1). This approach helps
choose the most appropriate treatment for hypertension, and aids with
management of potassium depletion from diuretics.
References:
1. Green DM, Ropper AH, Kronmal RA, Psaty BM, Burke GL, for the
Cardiovascular Health Study. Serum potassium level and dietary potassium
intake as risk factors for stroke. Neurology 2002; 59:314-320.
2. Joffres MR, Ghadirian P, Fodor JG, Petrasovits A, Chockalingam A,
Hamet P. Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in Canada. Am J
Hypert 1997;10:1097-1102.
3. Spence JD. Physiologic tailoring of therapy for resistant
hypertension: 20 years' experience with stimulated renin profiling. Am J
Hypertension 1999;12:1077-1083.
4. Baker EH, Duggal A, Dong Y, Ireson NJ, Wood M, Markandu ND,
MacGregor GA. Amiloride, a specific drug for hypertension in black people
with T594M variant? Hypertension 2002;40:13-17.
5. Gallay BJ, Ahmad S, Xu L, Toivola B, Davidson RC. Screening for
primary aldosteronism without discontinuing hypertensive medications:
plasma aldosterone-renin ratio. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:699-705.
Table: Tailoring of therapy according to renin/aldosterone profiling
Renin (low), Aldosterone (high)for Primary hyperaldosteronism
(Adrenocortical hyperplasia or Conn's adenoma), Treatment was
spironolactone or eplerinone.
Renin (low), Aldosterone (low) for Renal tubular abnormality:
Liddle's, Na Channel T594M variant, Treatment was Amiloride.
Renin (high), Aldosterone (high) for Renal hypertension: eg
renovascular, obstruction, cysts, tumor, etc., Treatment was angiotensin
receptor blockers or ACE inhibitors.
|
|
Reply to Letter to the Editor |
26 November 2002 |
|
|
Deborah M Green University of Hawaii Honolulu Hawaii, Allen H Ropper, Richard A Krommal, Bruce M Psaty and Gregory L Burke for The Cardiovascular Health Study
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Reply to Letter to the Editor
dgreen{at}queens.org Deborah M Green, et al.
|
We appreciate Hart et al. from the SPAF study examining their cohort
data in order to compare it with our results. One of our findings was
that the small number of diuretic users with lower serum potassium and
atrial fibrillation had a 10-fold greater risk of stroke compared with
those with higher serum potassium without atrial fibrillation. [1] The
SPAF findings do not contradict our findings. They calculate the risk of
stroke for those diuretic users with serum potassium levels less than 4.1
meq/L compared with greater than 4.0 meq/L among participants with atrial
fibrillation. However, in our study the comparison group was those
diuretic users without atrial fibrillation and a serum potassium level
greater than 4.0 meq/L. If we restrict our analysis to those with atrial
fibrillation, there is a relative risk of 4.7 (p=0.026, 95% confidence
interval of 1.2 to 18.2) for a potassium level less than 4.1 compared with
greater than 4.0 after adjustments for covariates. These confidence
intervals overlap with theirs (RR 1.5, p=0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.9
to 2.4), therefore their results are within sampling error of ours.
SPAF study participants were treated with either aspirin or placebo and
were more closely monitored than those in CHS, thereby potentially
decreasing the relative risk by preventing some strokes in those with low
serum potassium.
In the CHS only 21% of those with lower potassium and 20% with higher
potassium levels were using potassium supplements, compared with 43% and
42% in SPAF. The greater use of potassium supplementation in the SPAF
trial may have made it more difficult to detect an effect of low serum
potassium on stroke risk.
Their results also cannot challenge our overall finding of higher
stroke risk associated with lower serum potassium level that we found for
all diuretic users with or without atrial fibrillation. Nor do they
address our finding of higher stroke risk with low dietary potassium
intake among older individuals not taking diuretics. We agree with Hart
et al. that no recommendations can be made with regard to diuretic use
based on these studies however, we question whether diuretics would be
more effective with closer potassium level monitoring and supplementation.
We again encourage further prospective studies or reexamination of prior
cohort studies to corroborate our findings.
References:
1) Green DM, Ropper AH, Kroumal RA, Psaty BM, Burke GL, for The
Cardiovascular Health Study. Serum potassium level and dietary potassium
intake as risk factors for stroke. Neurology 2002;59:314-320.
|
|
Serum potassium level and dietary potassium intake as risk factors for stroke |
18 November 2002 |
|
|
Robert G Hart University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonia TX, Lesly A Pearce
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Serum potassium level and dietary potassium intake as risk factors for stroke
HARTR{at}uthscsa.edu Robert G Hart, et al.
|
Green et al. from the Cardiovascular Health Study report an increased
stroke risk among
24 elderly patients with atrial fibrillation who used diuretics and whose
serum potassium levels were <4.0 mEq/L. [1] As proposed by these
investigators, we examined this finding in a larger cohort of participants
in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation trials. [2]
Excluding those with prior stroke/TIA, there were 584 atrial
fibrillation patients who were not anticoagulated, who were receiving
diuretics, and whose serum potassium was recorded at study entry. Among
diuretic users, serum potassium level was not significantly predictive of
stroke when analyzed as a continuous variable (p=0.5). However, the stroke
rate was 5.1% per year for the 190 diuretic users whose serum potassium
was <4.0 mEq/L vs. 2.7% per year for the remaining 394 patients
(unadjusted relative risk = 1.9, p=0.05). Among 72 additional patients
with prior stroke/TIA who were receiving diuretics (such patients were
excluded by Green et al.), there was a trend for decreased stroke with
serum potassium levels of <4.0 mEq/L (unadjusted relative risk = 0.4,
p=0.07). Among atrial fibrillation patients not receiving diuretics (n =
1189), serum potassium levels were not related to stroke risk (p=0.9 for
serum potassium dichotomized at < 4.0, p = 0.4 if continuous).
To further explore potential mechanisms underlying the association
between serum potassium levels of <4.0 mEq/L and stroke in diuretic
users, the frequency of risk factors for stroke in atrial fibrillation
patients was compared according to the serum potassium level [2]: those
with lower serum potassium levels had more stroke risk factors. (Table)
The observed stroke rate among atrial fibrillation patients using
diuretics with low serum potassium levels was only modestly, and not
significantly, increased over that predicted by concomitant risk factors.
(Table) [2] considering all 11 patients without a prior stroke/TIA and
adjusting for risk factors (age, sex,
hypertension, and systolic BP>160 mmHg), a serum potassium level
<4.0 mEQ/L among diuretic users was not independently associated with
stroke (relative risk+1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.4;p=0.12).
These analyses confirm the association between serum potassium levels
<4.0 mEq/L and stroke risk among atrial fibrillation patients taking
diuretics. However, at least part of the increased risk is explained by
comorbid conditions, rather than due to a direct effect of low serum
potassium, itself. Consequently, it is uncertain whether avoiding
diuretic agents or whether treatment of low serum potassium levels would
reduce stroke in these patients.
References
1. Green DM, Ropper AH, Kronmal RA, Psaty BM, Burke GL for the
Cardiovascular Health Study. Serum potassium level and dietary potassium
intake as risk factors for stroke. Neurology 2002; 59: 314-320.
2. Hart RG, Pearce LA, McBride R, Rothbart RM, Asinger RW. Factors
associated with stroke during aspirin therapy in atrial fibrillation:
Analysis of 2012 participants in the SPAF I-III trials. Stroke 1999;30:
1223-1229.
-
Table. Diuretic Users with Atrial Fibrillation: Patient Features*
First figure represents Potassium < 4.0 mEq/L
N = 190. Second figure represents Potassium > 4.0 mEq/L
N = 394.
Third figure is p.
Age, yrs (mean) 71 70 0.88
Women (%) 38 34 0.39
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg (mean)
142 137 0.005
Systolic blood pressure >160 (%)
15 9 0.03
Hypertension (%) 81 74 0.08
Diabetes (%) 20 24 0.24
Recent heart failure (%) 17 20 0.48
Estimated GFR# (mean)(cc/min) 73 73 0.99
Furosemide use (%),n = 366 48 66 0.001
Thiazide use (%), n = 366 49 31 0.001
ACEinhibitoruse(%),n = 340 35 46 0.06
Potassium supplement (%) 43 42 0.86
Predicted stroke rate** 3.9 3.6
(%/yr)
Observed stroke rate 5.1(3.2,8.1) 2.7 (1.7,4.1)
(%/yr) (95%CI)
*Participants without prior stroke or TIA. GFR = glomerular
filtration rate, ACE = angiotension converting enzyme.
# Estimated according to the formula: GFR = [(140 - age(yrs)) x
weight (kg)] / [72 x serum creatinine (mg/dL)]. For women, multiply by
0.85.
** Modelled on the frequency of risk factors for stroke in atrial
fibrillation patients (2); patients with prior thromboembolism excluded. |
Copyright © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
| Advertisement
|