Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
-
- ARTICLES:
S. N. Raja, J. A. Haythornthwaite, M. Pappagallo, M. R. Clark, T. G. Travison, S. Sabeen, R. M. Royall, and M. B. Max
- Opioids versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Neurology 2002; 59: 1015-1021
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Correspondence published:
-
Reply to Letter to the Editor
- Srinivasa N Raja, Jennifer A Haythornthwaite and Mitchel Max
(13 November 2002)
-
Opioids versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: A randomized, placebo-controlled tria
- Paolo L Manfredi
(13 November 2002)
|
Reply to Letter to the Editor |
13 November 2002 |
|
|
Srinivasa N Raja John Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD, Jennifer A Haythornthwaite and Mitchel Max
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Reply to Letter to the Editor
sraja{at}jhmi.edu Srinivasa N Raja, et al.
|
Dr. Manfredi is accurate in pointing out subtle distinctions in the
receptors affected by morphine and methadone in preclinical studies.
However, it is not yet clear whether these differences contribute to the
analgesic effects of methadone. While experts opine that methadone may be
helpful in treating pain unresponsive to pure opioid agonists, this
important issue requires systematic study in the context of randomized,
controlled trials directly comparing these drugs.
Two findings from our study suggest that methadone may not be a
superior agent to pure opioid agonists such as morphine in the treatment
of neuropathic pain [3]. First, a subgroup of patients was placed on
methadone after developing intolerable side effects to morphine (41%). In
this group, dose escalation produced a lower maintenance dose (methadone-
15 mg) than the maintenance dose attained by the subgroup that remained on
morphine (91 mg). Since side effects limited dose titration, some
patients may be predisposed to side effects from mu opioid agonists and
this predisposition may limit the usefulness of this class of drugs in
these individuals. Second, the reduction in pain intensity by methadone
(1.2) in the same group of patients was lower compared to the analgesic
effects of morphine (2.2) in the group who remained on the primary
medication. These findings are not consistent with the clinical lore that
methadone is helpful in treating pain unresponsive to traditional mu
opioid agonists.
The results of our study are consistent with the previous work by
Watson and Babul using oxycodone in patients with postherpetic neuralgia
[3]. Two different opioid agonists, morphine and oxycodone, have been
shown to be effective in reducing neuropathic pain, hence we disagree with
the author's conclusion that the results of this study may not be
reproducible with pure opioid agonists [1].
References:
1) Reisine, T., and Pasternak, G.W., Opioid analgesics and
antagonists. In Goodman & Gilman's: The Pharmacological Basis of
Therapeutics, ed. By J.G. Hardman and L.E. Limbird, McGraw-Hill (1996) 521
-556.
2) Raja SN, Haythornthwaite JA, Pappagallo M, Clark MR et al, Opioids
versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: A randomized, placebo-
controlled trial. Neurology 2002;59:1015-1021.
3) Watson CP, Babul N. Efficacy of oxycodone in neuropathic pain: A
randomized trial in postherpetic neuralgia. Neurology 1998;50:1837-1841.
|
|
Opioids versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: A randomized, placebo-controlled tria |
13 November 2002 |
|
|
Paolo L Manfredi Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Opioids versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: A randomized, placebo-controlled tria
manfredp{at}mskcc.org Paolo L Manfredi
|
In this study, methadone was used by 41% of patients during opioid
treatment. Methadone has activity at three different sites: agonistic
activity at the mu opioid receptor [2], antagonistic activity at the N-
methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor [3] and inhibitory activity on
monoamine re-uptake [4]. These latter two actions are not shared by
morphine or by other commonly used opioids such as oxycodone and fentanyl.
Methadone's antagonistic activity at the NMDA receptor may result in
analgesia against neuropathic pain and other chronic pain states [5]. In
addition, the opioid agonist spectrum of methadone is different compared
to morphine [6]. Over the last few years, experts in the field of pain
management have rediscovered methadone as a very effective analgesic,
especially useful for pain unresponsive to other opioids [7, 8, 9]. The
analgesic efficacy of opioids seen in Raja et al. study may be at least in
part due to methadone's antagonistic activity at the NMDA receptor or its
inhibitory activity on mono-amine re-uptake and not solely a result of
pure opioid activity [1]. Although the pain in the methadone group
decreased less than in the morphine group, the study design selected the
methadone patients based on intolerable side effects from a small dose of
opioid (morphine 15 mg every 12 hours). Interestingly there was no dose
escalation with methadone and a 3-fold dose escalation with morphine.
Therefore, methadone is a unique analgesic with actions at three different
sites. The results of this study may not be reproducible when pure opioid
agonists, such as morphine, oxycodone, and fentanyl are used alone.
References:
1) Raja SN, Haythornthwaite JA, Pappagallo M et al. Opioids versus
antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia. A randomized, placebo
controlled trial. Neurology 2002;59: 1015-1021.
2) Reisine, T., and Pasternak, G.W., Opioid analgesics and
antagonists. In Goodman & Gilman's: The Pharmacological Basis of
Therapeutics, ed. By J.G. Hardman and L.E. Limbird, McGraw-Hill (1996) 521
-556.
3) Gorman, A.L., Elliott, K.J. and Inturrisi, C.E., The d- and l-
isomers of methadone bind to the non-competitive sit on the N-methyl-D-
aspartate (NMDA) receptor in rat forebrain and spinal cord, Nerurosci Lett
1997;223:5-8.
4) Codd E, Shank R, Schupsky J, Raffia R. serotonin and
norepinephrine uptake inhibiting activity of centrally acting analgesics:
structural determinants and role in antinociception. J Pharmacol Exp Ther
1995;274:1263-1270.
5) Davis AM and Inturrisi CE: d-Methadone blocks morphine tolerance
and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA)-induced hyperalgesia. J. Pharmacol Exp
Ther 1999; 289:1048-53.
6) Chang A, Emmel DW, Rossi GC, Pasternak GW. Methadone analgesia in
morphine-insensitive CXBK mice. Eur J Pharm 1988;351:189-191.
7) Bruera and Sweeney. Methadone use in cancer patients with pain: a
review. J Pall Med 2002; 5:127-138.
8) Davis MP and Walsh D. Methadone for relief of cancer pain: a
review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions and
protocols of administration. Support Care Cancer 2001; 9:63-83.
9) Ripamonti and Dickerson. Strategies for the treatment of pain in
the new millennium. Drugs 2001;61:955-977.
|
Copyright © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
| Advertisement
|