We read with interest the article by Schulte et al [1] describing the electrophysiological characteristics of SPG4, the most frequent
autosomal dominant form of hereditary spastic paraplegia (AD-
HSP). The SPG4 gene named spastin maps to chromosome 2p
and a variety of mutations have been identified. Most mutations
are missense, nonsense, frameshift and splicing point mutations.
The authors found that despite indistinguishable clinical
presentation between the two groups, nerve conduction studies
are almost normal in SPG4 (five families), whereas most non-SPG4
AD-HSP patients (seven families) show delay in central (CMCT) or
peripheral motor conduction (PMCT) time, or both.
The German group has recently reported one SPG4 family with a
large genomic deletion ranging from exons 13 to 16. [2] This first
indicates that mutations (e.g. genomic rearrangement)
undetectable by conventional PCR-based sequencing underlie
the disease. This family showed abnormal findings of motor
evoked potentials (MEP) and CMCT by transcranial magnetic
stimulation (TMS), while the other family with a nonsense mutation
(1299delG in exon 9) was not different from controls. The clinical
course was similar between these two pedigrees, including age of
onset and severity of symptoms.
We studied four affected individuals from a large Japanese AD-HSP
family linked to the SPG4 locus (maximum lod score 3.53) [3],
where no mutation was detected in the 17 coding exons or their
splice sites, or 5 and 3 untranslated regions of spastin.[4] The
deletion of exons 13 to 16 was also excluded. Neurophysiological
findings in all the four patients consistently showed normal CMCT
and MEP in thenar muscles by TMS, and normal somatosensory
evoked potentials after median and tibial nerve stimulation.
However, MEP in tibialis anterior muscles (TA) was of significantly
lower magnitude with polyphasic waves, while CMCT to TA was
normal. We did not detect any abnormalities in PMCT.
Additional SPG4-linked families without identifiable mutations are
described elsewhere. [5] Although the authors did not exclude the
possibility that electrophysiologically abnormal patients
categorized as non-SPG4 might have other spastin mutations [1],
we have to be cautious in interpreting their data and recognize
SPG4 mutations other than those reported previously, restricted to
respective exons or their surrounding regions. The variable clinical
expression and incomplete penetrance is already noted in SPG4.
The aforementioned data suggest that electrophysiological
findings in SPG4 are also variable despite similar clinical
presentation, dependent on the type of mutation. Further
investigations are required to explore other type of mutations and
delineate the genotype-phenotype correlation.
References
1. Schulte T, Miterski B, Bornke C, Przuntek H, Epplen JT, Schols
L. Neurophysiological findings in SPG4 patients differ from other
types of spastic paraplegia. Neurology 2003;60:1529-1532.
2. Bonsch D, Schwindt A, Navratil P, et al. Motor system
abnormalities in hereditary spastic paraparesis type 4 (SPG4)
depend on the type of mutation in the spastin gene.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:1109-1112.
3. Matsuura T, Sasaki H, Wakisaka A, Hamada T, Moriwaka F,
Tashiro K. Autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia linked to
chromosome 2p: clinical and genetic studies of a large Japanese
pedigree. J Neurol Sci 1997;151:65-70.
4. Yabe I, Sasaki H, Tashiro K, Matsuura T, Takegami T, Satoh T.
Spastin gene mutation in Japanese with hereditary spastic
paraplegia. J Med Genet 2002;39:e46.
5. Svenson IK, Ashley-Koch AE, Gaskell PC, et al. Identification
and expression analysis of spastin gene mutations in hereditary
spastic paraplegia. Am J Hum Genet 2001;68:1077-1085.