Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
-
- ARTICLES:
L.B. Goldstein, D.B. Matchar, J. Hoff-Lindquist, G.P. Samsa, and R.D. Horner
- VA Stroke Study: Neurologist care is associated with increased testing but improved outcomes
Neurology 2003; 61: 792-796
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Correspondence published:
-
VA Stroke Study: Neurologist care is associated with increased testing but improved outcomes
- Eric M Cheng, MD, MS, Gretchen Birbeck, Barbara Vickrey
(3 December 2003)
-
Reply to Cheng et al
- Larry B. Goldstein, David B. Matchar, Jennifer Hoff-Lindquist, Gregory P. Samsa, Ronnie D. Horner
(3 December 2003)
|
VA Stroke Study: Neurologist care is associated with increased testing but improved outcomes |
3 December 2003 |
|
|
Eric M Cheng, MD, MS, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System 11301 Wilshire Blvd; B500, ML 127; Dept of Neurology; Los Angeles, CA 90073, Gretchen Birbeck, Barbara Vickrey
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: VA Stroke Study: Neurologist care is associated with increased testing but improved outcomes
eric.cheng{at}med.va.gov Eric M Cheng, MD, MS, et al.
|
We read with interest the article by Goldstein et al [1] that
reported twice the rate of deterioration in the first 24 hours, and worse
discharge functional status and mortality rates among acute stroke
patients cared for by non-neurologists compared to those having
neurologist attendings. These findings, based on a prospective,
observational study conducted at nine VA hospitals, are carefully reported
as associations, not causal.
Though the investigators adjusted for stroke severity (via Canadian
Neurologic Scale) and comorbidity, the potential for confounding due to
other, unmeasured prognostic characteristics remains high. At the West
Los Angeles VA Hospital, assignment of stroke patients to inpatient
neurology service vs. inpatient “non-neurology” service is not random and
is highly influenced by the patients’ clinical state and perceived acuity.
Stroke patients deemed by the neurology service to have a high risk for
deterioration - such as those with stroke onset less than 72 hours - are
admitted to the inpatient medical intensive care service for access to
resources (i.e. 24-hour cardiac monitoring, nursing staff who can perform
frequent neurological assessments, residents who are in-house overnight)
that are not available on the inpatient neurology service. Therefore, we
would expect higher rates of deterioration and worse outcomes among
patients cared for on a non-neurology service at this VA hospital. This
would not be due to differences in quality of care, but to local triage
policy, itself driven by acuity (a characteristic not measured on the
Canadian Neurologic Scale). [2]
There may be other kinds of local hospital
policies regarding admission triage elsewhere, for example, policies that
patients presenting over a weekend be admitted to a medicine service.
Weekend admissions have been associated with increased mortality. [3]
The investigators also found differences in use of some diagnostic
tests and treatments. Additional data could help discern whether such
differences either explain or result from differences in outcomes. For
example, higher rates of speech therapy in the neurologist group might
have resulted from their better prognosis and hospital course, or – if
speech therapy was a venue for a swallowing evaluation early in the
hospitalization - it might have resulted in lower rates of aspiration
pneumonia. Information on the timing of this evaluation and on rates of
aspiration pneumonia would be useful. Data regarding blood pressure
management in the first 24 hours could also help explain early
deterioration and link outcome differences across groups to process
measures of quality of care. [4]
References
1. Goldstein LB, Matchar DB, Hoff-Lindquist J, Samsa GP, Horner RD.
VA Stroke Study: Neurologist care is associated with increased testing but
improved outcomes. Neurology 2003; 61:792-796.
2. Cote R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, Boucher J, Adam J, Hachinski V. The
Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment.
Neurology 1989; 39:638-643.
3. Bell CM, Redelmeier DA. Mortality among patients admitted to hospitals
on weekends as compared with weekdays. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:663-668.
4. Oliveira-Filho J, Silva SCS, Trabuco CC, Pedreira BB, Sousa EU,
Bacellar A. Detrimental effect of blood pressure reduction in the first 24
hours of acute stroke onset. Neurology 2003; 61:1047-1051. |
|
Reply to Cheng et al |
3 December 2003 |
|
|
Larry B. Goldstein, Durham VAMC & Duke University Box 3651-DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, David B. Matchar, Jennifer Hoff-Lindquist, Gregory P. Samsa, Ronnie D. Horner
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Reply to Cheng et al
golds004{at}mc.duke.edu Larry B. Goldstein, et al.
|
We thank Drs. Cheng, Birbeck and Vickrey for their comments. We
carefully pointed out in the Discussion section of our report that
VASt was an observational cohort study, and that factors
underlying the observed differences can only be partially inferred
based on the data that was collected. The potential for
confounding due to unmeasured factors is inherent in all studies of
this type.
However, we feel that biases based on acuity or
weekend hospital admissions are unlikely. Although the difference
was not significant, patients primarily cared for by a neurologist
had slightly greater acuity than those cared for by non-
neurologists (mean+/-S.E.M time from symptom onset to
admission= 1.2+/-0.1 days for neurologists vs. 1.5+/-0.2 days for
non-neurologists, Wilcoxon test, p=0.42). Although
there were differences in the levels of organization of stroke care
among the sites, there was no difference in outcome when sites
with or without a stroke unit or stroke team were compared.
Further, stroke severity, the most important predictor of outcome,
was virtually identical between patients primarily cared for by
neurologists and those cared for by non-neurologists.
Unfortunately, we do not have specific data to address the other
points raised, but any causal interpretations would be subject to
the same limitations pointed out by Cheng et al.
Hypothesis-driven data collection is required to directly address
these issues. Despite its limitations, the study is consistent with
previous work suggesting a benefit of specialist care. Additional
studies are needed to determine why stroke patients primarily
cared for by neurologists have better outcomes. |
Copyright © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
| Advertisement
|