Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS:
Randolph W. Evans, Richard B. Lipton, and Stephen D. Silberstein
We thank Dr. Sacks for his comments about our survey and the study by
Alvarez [2]. Alvarez reports on 44 physicians with migraine interviewed at
a medical convention. Eighty-seven percent had migraine aura without
headache, a much higher proportion than reported by the neurologists in
our survey. In addition, of 618 migraineurs seen in his specialty
practice, 12% of the men and 0.7% of the women reported scotomas without
headache. In a large well-designed Danish study, Russell et al [4] found a
much lower lifetime prevalence of aura without headache (1% of males and
3% of females). The results of Alvarez are limited by the potential for
selection bias and the lack of a well-specified case definition of
migraine.
We were also fascinated by Dr. Sacks’ personal history of rare
migraine auras leading to his interest in neurology. Though the burden of
migraine and other headaches on employment is enormous [5], this anecdote
indicates an important previously unrecognized benefit. Although the
prevalence of migraine is 66.6% among the authors of this publication (RWE
and SDS), we believe that our career choices were independent of our
personal medical histories.
References
4. Russell MB, Rasmussen BK, Thorvaldsen P, Olesen J. Prevalence and
sex-ratio of the subtypes of migraine. Int J Epidemiol 1995;24:612-618.
5. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee Elsbeth, Morganstein D, Lipton R. Lost
productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US
workforce. JAMA 2003;290:2443-2454.
I was fascinated by Evans et al's article [1] but surprised to find no reference to
Alvarez's 1960 paper on the prevalence of migraine scotoma in physicians.
He observed, in a group of 44 physicians, that no less than 87% had
experienced "many solitary scotomata with never a
headache," whereas in the general population (here he studied more than
600 patients) no more than 12% reported having experienced scotomata. [2]
Speculating on the possible reasons for the prevalence of
migraine in neurologists, and particularly headache specialists, Evans et
al. wonder, among other possibilities, whether "a personal history of
migraines might stimulate an interest in neurology and headache as a
subspecialty." For myself, with a personal history of classical migraines
(and, more often, isolated visual ones) going back to childhood, the
extraordinary phenomena of the aura (which for me included transient or
partial achromatopsia, akinetopsia, as well as visual agnosias, alexias,
etc), excited an interest in the brain, and especially in visual
processing, at an early age. These migraines were certainly one of the
reasons I was attracted to neurology, why I chose migraine as the subject
of my first book, and why I devoted a large part of this book to
illustrating the varied presentations of visual auras in my patients. [3]
References
1. Evans RW, Lipton RB, Silberstein SD.
The prevalence of migraine in neurologists
Neurology 2003; 61: 1271-1272.
2. Alvarez, WC. The Migraine Scotoma as Studied in 618
Persons. Amer. J. Ophthalmology 1960, 49: 489.
3. Sacks, OW. Migraine. University of California Press, 1970. see esp. pp 72-115.