Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS:
V. Ramaswamy, S. P. Miller, A. J. Barkovich, J. C. Partridge, and D. M. Ferriero
Perinatal stroke in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy
Neurology 2004; 62: 2088-2091
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
Perinatal stroke in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy
Frances M Cowan, Eugenio Mercuri, Mary A Rutherford
(31 August 2004)
Reply to Cowan et al
Donna M. Ferriero, Vijay Ramaswamy, Steven P. Miller, A. James Barkovich, J. Colin Partridge
(31 August 2004)
Perinatal stroke in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy
31 August 2004
Frances M Cowan, Imperial College, London Dept. of Paediatrics, Hammersmith Hospital, DuCane Rd, London W12 OHS, UK, Eugenio Mercuri, Mary A Rutherford
We read with interest the article by Ramaswamy et al [1] on stroke in term infants presenting with early neonatal encephalopathy. We
agree this is an unusual presentation of neonatal arterial territory
stroke.
We found a similar proportion
with stroke (8/197,4%) in encephalopathic term infants. [2] However, we found that the majority of these infants do not have evidence
of infection, cardiac disease or prothrombotic disorders. [3]
Our experience is that cognitive outcome is generally good following
unilateral arterial territory stroke. Hemiplegia will develop if basal
ganglia, internal capsule (PLIC) and hemispheric tissue are involved in
the primary lesion. [4] Cognition is poorer if there are bilateral infarcts
or other imaging abnormalities. We have observed a poor cognitive outcome
in two infants with small MCA territory infarcts but no hemiplegia – both
are mildly dysmorphic without specific diagnoses despite extensive
investigation. The other children with poor cognitive outcomes are those
few that later develop seizures.
We think the poor cognitive outcome reported here is mainly due to
bilateral tissue involvement; extensive white matter involvement is
associated with cognitive deficit. [5] If stroke is associated with basal
ganglia lesions, those will dominate the motor outcome.
In case 3 (Fig 1) in addition to the right-sided middle/posterior MCA
territory infarction, we believe that the image shows severe abnormality
in the left basal ganglia and PLIC. It is possible that the left-sided
lesions together with the watershed lesions account
for the severe outcome rather than the MCA territory lesion alone.
Several of the cited cases are also complicated. Case 1 is an infant
of a diabetic mother, a high risk group, case 2 has a large infarction on
the background of infection which may affect white matter and can be
difficult to assess on early conventional images. Cases 5 and 6 had additional lesions not confined to one arterial territory.
We feel the emphasis given to poor outcome with MCA territory
infarction is misleading and that the important issue in terms of
cognitive outcome is the extent of the additional watershed or bilateral
lesions. Nonetheless we strongly support that
clinicians need to be aware that neonatal stroke, when it occurs in an
unusual context, is more likely to be associated with a poorer cognitive
outcome and such infants deserve close neurodevelopmental follow up.
References
1.Ramaswamy V, Miller SP, Barkovich AJ, Partridge JC, Ferriero DM.
Perinatal stroke in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Neurology
2004;62:2088-91
2.Cowan F, Rutherford M, Groenendaal F, Eken P, Mercuri E, Bydder GM,
Meiners LC, Dubowitz L, de Vries LS. Origin and timing of brain lesions
in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet 2003; 361:736-42
3.Cheong JLY Dammann O, Bartels D, Simpson J, Rutherford MA, Dubowitz
L , Mercuri E, Cowan Focal brain lesions in the term infant: antenatal and
perinatal factors 2004 Early Hum Dev 2004;78:148-9
4.Mercuri E, Rutherford M, Cowan F, Pennock J, Counsell S,
Papadimitriou M, Azzopardi D, Bydder G, Dubowitz L. Early prognostic
indicators in infants with neonatal cerebral infarction: a clinical, EEG
and MRI study. Pediatrics 1999;103:39-46
5.Cowan F Dubowitz L, Mercuri E Counsell S, Barnett A, Rutherford MA
Cognitive deficits without major motor difficulties following perinatal
asphyxia and early encephalopathy: a consequence of white matter injury
2003 Early Hum Dev 2003;73:113-4
Reply to Cowan et al
31 August 2004
Donna M. Ferriero, University of California San Francisco Department of Neurology, Box 0663, 521 Parnassus Avenue, C215, San Francisco, CA 94143-0663, Vijay Ramaswamy, Steven P. Miller, A. James Barkovich, J. Colin Partridge
We thank Cowan et al for their comments. It appears that our data and theirs differ
in that underlying etiologies were not as common in their series. [2]
However, in the 8/197 newborns with evidence of acute injury
and neonatal encephalopathy and stroke, we were unable to
substantiate whether these affected babies had abnormalities
such as prothrombotic disease, infection or cardiac disease, since
the data are not provided.
Cowan reported that many babies had congenital malformations, metabolic disease and infections; these
are exclusion criteria for our cohort. [1] However, in the past, this
group has reported that 8/11 newborns with cerebral infarction had
poor neurologic outcome in association with prothrombotic risk
factors, while only 1/13 with normal outcome had these
associations. [6] These data appear to support the data in our
cohort.
In addition, in the largest series published to date, 127 out
of 215 neonates with stroke had a prothrombotic state. [7] It
seems that the majority of infants reported to date, including data
from Cowan's group, do have evidence of some underlying risk factors
for stroke.
We would like to believe that cognitive outcome is “generally
good” following unilateral arterial stroke in the newborn, but data
from one of the largest neonatal stroke cohorts [8, 9] suggest that >
50% have abnormal cognitive and neuromotor outcome. Cowan et al
hypothesize that poor cognitive outcome in their and our series is
due to 1) bilateral tissue involvement or 2) extensive white matter
disease. Cases 3, 5 and 6 did exhibit involvement of the
watershed zones bilaterally, but areas of signal abnormality were
minor. This bilateral involvement may portend a worse prognosis as suggested, but larger series will be needed to confirm this
hypothesis.
Case 2 did not have other brain regions involved
(despite the history that might suggest vulnerability to white
matter).
The cases that we reported are complicated in regard
to their neonatal course, but these complications only confirm that newborns with neonatal
encephalopathy must be considered for neuroimaging evaluation,
and that stroke should be in the differential. We never saw “extensive white matter involvement” that Cowan et al hypothesize
might be associated with cognitive abnormalities later in life. [5]
Our study does not confirm the
hypothesis that poor cognitive outcome is due to bilateral
hemispheric involvement or extensive white matter disease. Only
larger cohorts of newborns with stroke followed for long periods of
time will be able to answer this query.
References
5. Cowan F, Dubowitz L, Mercuri E, Counsell S, Rutherford M,
Barnett A. White matter injury can lead to cognitive deficits without
major motor difficulties following perinatal asphyxia and early
encephalopathy. In: Early Human Development; 2003. p. 113-114.
6. Mercuri E, Cowan F, Gupte G, Manning R, Laffan M, Rutherford
M, et al. Prothrombotic disorders and abnormal
neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with neonatal cerebral
infarction. Pediatrics 2001;107(6):1400-1404.
7. Kurnik K, Kosch A, Strater R, Schobess R, Heller C, Nowak-Gottl
U. Recurrent thromboembolism in infants and children suffering
from symptomatic neonatal arterial stroke: a prospective follow-up
study. Stroke 2003;34(12):2887-2892.
8. deVeber GA, MacGregor D, Curtis R, Mayank S. Neurologic
outcome in survivors of childhood arterial ischemic stroke and
sinovenous thrombosis. Journal of Child Neurology
2000;15(5):316-324.
9. deVeber GA, MacGregor D, Curtis R, Friefeld S, Anderson P,
Chan A, et al. Neurological outcome in survivors of neonatal
arterial ischemic stroke. Pediatric Research 2003;53(4 Part
2):537A.