Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
-
- ARTICLES:
D. Georgiadis, J. Oehler, S. Schwarz, V. Rousson, M. Hartmann, and S. Schwab
- Does acute occlusion of the carotid T invariably have a poor outcome?
Neurology 2004; 63: 22-26
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Correspondence published:
-
Reply to Samson
- Dimitrios Georgiadis, S. Schwarz, S. Schwab
(21 January 2005)
-
Does acute occlusion of the carotid T invariably have a poor outcome?
- Yves SAMSON, Sophie Crozier, Sandrine Deltour, Michael Obadia, Marie Bruandet and Anne Leger
(27 December 2004)
|
Reply to Samson |
21 January 2005 |
|
|
Dimitrios Georgiadis, Department of Neurology, University of Zürich, Frauenklinikstr. 26, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland, S. Schwarz, S. Schwab
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Reply to Samson
dg_de{at}yahoo.com Dimitrios Georgiadis, et al.
|
<P>We thank Dr. Samson for his letter
concerning our article. The presented results together with those of our
study, confirm that IV thrombolysis is a safe treatment in
acute stroke patients with carotid-T occlusions, as
symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was only observed
in 2/72 cases.
<P>Although recanalization rate was higher in our study (66%
versus 42%), outcome was worse (mRS 0-3 in 22% versus 74%). This marked
difference could be due to age differences between the
two groups, as noted by Dr. Samson. We concur that the presented results
add weight to the hypothesis that IV thrombolysis should not be
withheld in acute stroke patients with carotid T
occlusion, although more potent therapeutic approach
would certainly be needed in this specific patient
group.
|
|
Does acute occlusion of the carotid T invariably have a poor outcome? |
27 December 2004 |
|
|
Yves SAMSON, Service Urgences Cérébrovasculaires Hôpital Salpêtrière, 47-48 Bd de l'hôpital, 75013 PARIS, FRANCE, Sophie Crozier, Sandrine Deltour, Michael Obadia, Marie Bruandet and Anne Leger
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Does acute occlusion of the carotid T invariably have a poor outcome?
yves.samson{at}psl.ap-hop-paris.fr Yves SAMSON, et al.
|
Georgiadis et al [1] report
that carotid T occlusion may have a better clinical outcome than
previously thought, especially after IV thrombolysis. [2,3] In their series
of 42 consecutive patients, 17% achieved Rankin's score 2 six months post
-stroke and mortality rate was only 31 %. Furthermore, complete or partial
middle cerebral artery (MCA) recanalization was observed in 12 of the 18
thrombolyzed patients. This is interesting because intracranial
carotid occlusion is often considered as a contra-indication of IV and
even IA thrombolysis because of very low recanalization rate.
The results obtained in our stroke center confirm and extend their
findings. In a consecutive series of 100 patients treated with rTPA IV
within a 5-hour time period [4], 30 had intra-cranial carotid occlusion as
assessed by pre-thrombolysis MR (19 with T occlusion and 11 with intra-
cavernous carotid and ipsilateral MCA occlusions). Three of them were
subsequently treated by hemicraniectomy. Median NIHSS was 18,5 (range 7-
30), and 20 (range 7-30) in the T occlusion subgroup. At three months, 20% had Rankin's score 1, 70% Rankin 0-3, and mortality rate was only 10%.
The percentages were respectively 16, 74 and 16% in the T occlusion
subgroup. Complete MCA recanalization was documented on a 24-48 hours MRA
control in 43% of the 30 patients and 42% of the T occlusion subgroup.
Surprisingly, none of the patients developed symptomatic hemorrhage. Thus
outcome was even better than in Georgiadis report, perhaps because our
patients were younger: 49 (44 to 54) versus 66 (56 to 74) years (median
[interquartile range]). Both reports suggest that intra-cranial carotid
occlusion should not be considered as a contra-indication to IV
thrombolysis, although we obviously need new therapeutic approach since
MCA recanalization is only achieved in less than half of the patients.
References
1) Georgiadis D, Oehler J, Schwarz S, Rousson V, Hartmann M, Schwab S. Does acute occlusion of the carotid T invariably have a poor
outcome? Neurology, 2004; 63: 22-26.
2) Bogousslavsky J, Regli F. Prognosis of symptomatic intracranial
obstruction of internal carotid artery. Eur Neurol 1983;22:351-358.
3) Jansen O, von Kummer R, Forsting M, Hacke W, Sartor K. Thrombolytic
therapy in acute occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery
bifurcation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1977-1986.
4) Crozier S, Deltour S, Bruandet M, et al. Routine use of MRI before intravenous thrombolysis in
a 5 hours time-window: initial experience in 100 patients with middle
cerebral artery infarct. Neurology 2004, Suppl.5, 62: A537, S64.005. |
Copyright © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
| Advertisement
|