Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Bruce A. Cohen M.D., Daniel D. Mikol, M.D. Ph.D
(7 June 2005)
Mitoxantrone treatment of multiple sclerosis: Safety considerations
Robert G. Pratt, PharmD, Gerard A. Boehm, MD, MPH, Cindy M. Kortepeter, PharmD, Judith A. Racoosin, MD, MPH
(7 June 2005)
Reply to Pratt et al
7 June 2005
Bruce A. Cohen M.D., Davee Dept of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University 710 North Lake Shore Drive, Abbott Hall 1121, Chicago Illinois 60611, Daniel D. Mikol, M.D. Ph.D
bac106{at}northwestern.edu Bruce A. Cohen M.D., et al.
We appreciate the comments of Pratt et al regarding our comments
on the need for more frequent monitoring of cardiac function when treating
MS patients with mitoxantrone. [1]
The recent recommendations by Serono
and the FDA now make our suggested intervals
obsolete. Current data has indicated a low risk for both symptomatic heart failure and
asymptomatic but significant reductions in cardiac ejection fraction. [2]
Nonetheless, Avasarala et al described five
patients with early significant decline in ejection fraction while
undergoing mitoxantrone therapy for MS. [3] We concur with the decision by
Serono and the FDA to amend the product labeling for mitoxantrone to
incorporate earlier and more frequent cardiac monitoring. Prompt
recognition of significant asymptomatic reduction in ejection fraction
should further reduce the low incidence of symptomatic cardiac
failure with this agent in doses used for MS.
2. Ghalie RG, Edan G, Laurent M, et al. Cardiac adverse effects associated
with mitoxantrone (Novantrone)therapy in patients with MS. Neurology
2002;59:909-913.
3. Avasarala JR, Cross AH, Clifford DB, et al. Rapid onset mitoxantrone-
induced cardiotoxicity in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult
Scler 2003;9:59-62.
Mitoxantrone treatment of multiple sclerosis: Safety considerations
7 June 2005
Robert G. Pratt, PharmD, FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 5600 Fishers Lane, HFD-430 Rockville, MD 20857, Gerard A. Boehm, MD, MPH, Cindy M. Kortepeter, PharmD, Judith A. Racoosin, MD, MPH
prattr{at}cder.fda.gov Robert G. Pratt, PharmD, et al.
Evaluation of cardiac safety data in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients
treated with mitoxantrone (Novantrone) has led the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and Serono, Inc. (the manufacturer of Novantrone) to
issue updated product labeling recommendations for cardiac monitoring.
In
a recent review paper outlining the safety issues to consider when using
mitoxantrone to treat patients with worsening MS, Cohen and Mikol [1]
discuss mitoxantrone-induced cardiotoxicity and recommendations for
cardiac monitoring; these authors advocate more frequent measurement of
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We agree that more frequent
monitoring is in the best interest of patient safety and bring to your
attention revised cardiac monitoring recommendations that have just been
added to the mitoxantrone labeling.
The revised mitoxantrone labeling states that for MS patients, LVEF
should be evaluated by echocardiogram or multiple gated radionuclide
angiography (MUGA) prior to administration of the initial dose and prior
to each subsequent dose of mitoxantrone, as well as whenever the patient
develops signs or symptoms of heart failure.
The updated cardiac monitoring recommendations are based on a review
of postmarketing reports submitted to the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting
System and an interim analysis of data from the RENEW postmarketing study
being conducted by Serono, Inc. These analyses identified MS patients who
experienced decreases in LVEF with and without clinically symptomatic
congestive heart failure and occurring at cumulative doses of less than
100 mg/m2. In some patients, decreases in LVEF of at least 10% from
baseline (a clinically important reduction) were observed with cumulative
doses below 36 mg/m2. Furthermore, Avasarala et al [2] described five
patients with MS who received a minimum cumulative dose of 37.5 mg/m2 of
mitoxantrone and experienced a "significant decline in LVEF from
baseline". Because these patients did not receive LVEF monitoring prior
to each dose, the decreases in LVEF reported for a particular cumulative
dose could have been present at a lower cumulative dose and gone
undetected.
Mitoxantrone is known to have cardiotoxic effects which can be life
threatening in severe cases. Available data suggest that patients can
experience declines in LVEF at cumulative doses below the previously
recommended cumulative dose threshold for monitoring. The updated cardiac
monitoring recommendation will allow for earlier detection of decreases in
LVEF in mitoxantrone treated MS patients and allow for discontinuation of
mitoxantrone in affected patients.