Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
ARTICLES:
A. G. Wood, A. S. Harvey, R. M. Wellard, D. F. Abbott, V. Anderson, M. Kean, M. M. Saling, and G. D. Jackson
Amanda Wood, A. S. Harvey, R. M. Wellard, D. F. Abbott, V. Anderson, M. Kean, M. M. Saling, and G. D. Jackson
(25 August 2005)
Language cortex activation in normal children
Helen F. Stanbro, MPhil
(25 August 2005)
Reply to Stanbro
25 August 2005
Amanda Wood, Department of Medicine (Neurosciences) Monash Medical Centre, 5th floor, E block, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, 3168, Victoria, Australia, A. S. Harvey, R. M. Wellard, D. F. Abbott, V. Anderson, M. Kean, M. M. Saling, and G. D. Jackson
Amanda.Wood{at}med.monash.edu.au Amanda Wood, et al.
We thank Ms. Stanbro for her comments. She asserts that many words in our activation paradigm
could be used as verbs. Indeed, almost any noun can function as a verb,
especially in current English usage. One of the paper's authors used the
majority of the nouns as verbs in a response, part of which is reproduced
here: "Maybe we should fire up our computers, key in a response, hammer
our point home, fish around for more information and fire off a salvo.
Would you like to pencil in a meeting so that we can clock up some
thinking time? I'll chair it if you like, and I'll bicycle over to your
office."
While it is possible that this strategy may be employed by some
adults with good English language skills, it seems an unlikely approach
in, for example, six year olds. As part of our study we piloted the words
in children aged six to 15 and their overt responses indicated that they
were using or interpreting the words as nouns. The detection of relative
ambiguity at the single word level ought to develop relatively late, being
a higher-order aspect of language. Furthermore, the instructions given to
participants created a mental set that the word viewed on screen would be
a noun ("object"). [1]
Language cortex activation in normal children
25 August 2005
Helen F. Stanbro, MPhil, none 1632 Camino Redondo, Los Alamos NM 87544
In the article by Wood et al, there is a section on verb generation
paradigms where a list of "nouns" is given. According to the authors, these were words "which could not
be read as either a noun or a verb (for example 'sail')." Here is the
list: rabbit, child, artist, pig, bird, wolf, fire, fish, needle, knife, balloon, cat,
ball, wheel, key, ship, plant, lion, sun, horse, wind, door, mouse, hair, frog, clock,
kangaroo, top, rain, dog, bell, baby, train, scissors, light, kite, bee, windmill,
shoe, pencil, shirt, broom, chair, eagle, water, paper, hammer, apple, bed, bicycle,
block, spoon, bottle, and cup.
Despite this assertion, at least 33 of these 54
words* can be read as either a noun or a verb (and in many cases, as an
adjective), and one of them, "wind," is a homograph which can be a verb in
both its meanings (e.g., "Roland was determined to wind his horn one last
time before he perished at Roncesvalles" or "You must wind this old-
fashioned clock with a key.").
It would be desirable to repeat the experiment with a list of
undisputed nouns to see if the results are different.
References
1) Wood A, Harvey AS, Wellard RM, et al. Language cortex activation in normal children. Neurology 2004;63:1035-1044.