I read the report by Fricker et al with interest. [1] The authors describe the improved seizure control and quality of life in patients switched from immediate to extended release carbamazepine. With regard to medication compliance, this is logical. However, there are further issues the authors should address.
Blood
levels were not checked and, in addition, the authors do not indicate whether the immediate release
carbamazepine was brand or generic and if each patient had used the same
generic formulation. The same issue exists regarding the extended release
form. This distinction is particularly important if the extended release form
was uniform (from one manufacturer) and the immediate release form was not (from
multiple manufacturers).
The possible difference is same dose
bioavailability or bioequivalence in the products of different
manufacturers, particularly in the case of anticonvulsants. This issue has been
previously addressed. [2,3]
References
1. Ficker DM et al. Improved tolerability and efficacy in epilepsy
patients with extended release carbamazepine. Neurology 2005:65: 593-
595.
2. Lesser RP, Krauss G. Editorial. Buy some today. Can generics be
safely substitued for brand-named drugs? Neurology 2001: 57 571-573.
3. Gilman JT, ALvarez LA, Duchowsky M. Carbamazepine toxicity
resulting from generic substitution. Neurology 1993: 43: 2696-2697.
The author reports no conflicts of interest.