Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
-
- BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS:
Virginia C.N. Wong, Ching-Wan Lam, and Cheuk Wing Fung
- Stiff child syndrome with mutation of DYT1 gene
Neurology 2005; 65: 1465-1466
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Correspondence published:
-
Stiff child syndrome with mutation of DYT1 gene
- Paul E Greene, William Dauer, MD, New York, NY
(29 December 2005)
-
Reply from the author
- Virginia Wong
(29 December 2005)
|
Stiff child syndrome with mutation of DYT1 gene |
29 December 2005 |
|
|
Paul E Greene, Columbia University 710 West 168 Street, New York, NY 10032, William Dauer, MD, New York, NY
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Stiff child syndrome with mutation of DYT1 gene
greene{at}neuro.columbia.edu Paul E Greene, et al.
|
We were intrigued by the report of a boy with DYT1 presenting as
stiff person syndrome (SPS). [1] However, the videotape seems to be
consistent with painful DYT1-type dystonia. The authors diagnosed SPS
because of painful spasms lasting hours, triggered by a variety of stimuli
and improved after plasmapheresis. Unlike typical SPS (or the variant
stiff-limb syndrome), in between spasms there was dystonic posturing and
no abnormal motor unit activity. The absence of anti-GAD antibodies is
against the diagnosis of SPS, but hardly definitive. [2] Painful limb
dystonia is uncommon in DYT1, but not unheard of. In its most extreme
form, a state of continuous or near continuous, painful dystonic spasms
has been termed “dystonic storm” and has been reported several times in
DYT1 dystonia. [3,4] The juvenile onset of dystonia in the legs is also
typical of the disease.
The authors conclude that the phenotypic heterogeneity of DYT1 might
include an SPS-like picture, or that their patient might have an
incidental and clinically silent DYT1 mutation. Based on the video, we
suggest an alternative conclusion: that their patient had a typical,
albeit severe, manifestation of DYT1 dystonia. Other conditions have been
mistaken for SPS. It is now widely recognized that many, if not all,
infants with stimulus-evoked stiffness have hyperekplexia, not an
infantile variant of SPS. [5]
Except in the presence of dystonic
posturing, we believe screening for DYT1 in all children with muscle
stiffness, as the authors suggest, will be unproductive.
References
1. Wong VCN, Lam C-W, Fung CW. Stiff child syndrome with mutation of
DYT1 gene. Neurology 2005;65:1465-1466.
2. Murinson BB. Stiff-person syndrome. Neurologist 2004;10:131-137.
3. Jankovic J, Penn AS. Severe dystonia and myoglobinuria. Neurology
1982;32:1195-1197.
4. Dalvi A, Fahn S, Ford B. Intrathecal baclofen in the treatment
of dystonic storm. Mov Disord 1998;13:611-612.
5. Cioni G, Biagioni E, Bottai P, Castellacci AM, Paolicelli PB.
Hyperekplexia and stiff-baby syndrome: an identical neurological
disorder?. Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences 1993;14:145-152. |
|
Reply from the author |
29 December 2005 |
|
|
Virginia Wong, Division of Neurodevelopmental Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Send Correspondence to journal:
Re: Reply from the author
vcnwong{at}hku.hk Virginia Wong
|
We thank Greene et al for their comments. The initial diagnosis was difficult in this case. At four years old, this boy had an onset of ankle stiffness, then gradual
appearance of severe muscle stiffness, painful spasms and dystonia 2 years
later. A diagnosis of SM/SPS rather than ITS was possible considering the subsequent EMG findings with continuous motor unit activity
during spasms (and abolition with anesthesia) and positive anti-GAD antibodies
in his insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) sister. [1]
We also presented this case at the International Movement Disorder
Conference in New Orleans (2005) and the comments of various experts
including Professor Stanley Fahn were helpful in preparing this paper.
The detection of DYT1 mutation in this boy and his asymptomatic
mother might be a coincidence. There is incomplete
penetrance of only 30-40% in patients with ITD and the phenotype of ITD
has been widely recognized since the detection of DYT1 mutation in 1997. [6] Therefore, a positive differentiation is not realistic unless a sensitive and specific
laboratory test is available to differentiate all diseases with dystonia as the major
feature. I would suggest these diseases belong to different severity of a
spectrum of disorder.
As in other diseases with
known mutation and genotypic-phenotypic variation, a consortium of experts
in SM/SPS and dystonia is needed to delineate the diagnostic checklist, both clinically and genetically, in
order to benefit clinicians who are treating challenging cases. [7,8]
References
6. Bressman S. Dystonia Genotypes, Phenotypes, and Classification,
in Advances in Neurology: Dystonia 4, H.M. Fahn S, DeLong MR, Editor.
2004, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. p. 101-107.
7. Meinck, H.T., PD, Stiff Man Syndrome and Related Conditions.
Movement Disorders, 2002. 17(5): p. 853-866.
8.Bressman, S.S., C; Raymond, D; de Leon, D; Klein, C; Kramer, PL;
Brin, MF; Fahn, S; Breakefield, X; Ozelius, LJ; Risch, NJ, The DYT 1
phenotype and guidelines for diagnostic testing. Neurology, 2000. 54(9):
p. 1746-1753.
The author reports no conflicts of interest. |
Copyright © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
| Advertisement
|