Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
ARTICLES:
Peter Zeeberg, Jes Olesen, and Rigmor Jensen
Probable medication-overuse headache: The effect of a 2-month drug-free period
Neurology 2006; 66: 1894-1898
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
I read the article by Zeeberg et al [1] with interest in which they
emphasize the therapeutic importance of weaning patients suspected of
suffering from medication overuse headache (MOH). Do the authors feel there
is a possibility that the observed improvement in headache could be partially due to an "inverse" placebo effect?
The placebo effect can be
defined as "improvement in the condition of a patient that occurs in
response to treatment but cannot be considered due to the specific
treatment used." [2] Patients expecting an improvement in symptoms
following the specific treatment of drug withdrawal may experience such an
effect. It is scientifically appealing to conduct a double-blind
controlled trial in which the "placebo" arm consists of patients
continuing active pharmacological therapy while patients in the "active
treatment" arm receive an inert substance.
Although this is arguably the
ideal way to establish MOH as a distinct clinical entity, the authors'
pragmatic approach provides convincing evidence guiding the management of
this problematic clinical situation.
References
1. Zeeberg, P., J. Olesen, R. Jensen. Probable medication-overuse headache: the effect of a 2-month drug-free period. Neurology 2006;66:1894-1898.
2.
Medline Plus Merriam Webster Dictionary. http://www2.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/mwmednlm?book=Medical&va=placebo%20effect. Accessed August 31, 2006.
Disclosure: The author reports no conflicts of interest.
Reply from the Authors
31 August 2006
Peter Zeeberg, Danish Headache Center Dept. of Neurology, Univ. Copenhagen, Glostrup Hosp., Nordre Ringvej 57, DK-2600 Glostrup, DENMARK, Jes Olesen, Rigmor Jensen
Dr. Gotkine’s question highlights an important aspect of all pain
research – the placebo effect. Due to the uncontrolled
open study design, we can not rule out the possibility of an
"inverse" placebo effect. There are, however, several reasons to believe
that this possible "inverse" placebo effect is minimal in our study.
In
prophylactic migraine trials, the reduction in migraine attacks due to
placebo response has been estimated to 16.8% [3], but with large variation
between studies. In acute migraine attacks, the average headache response
rate to placebo is even higher (30%). [4]
If a significant placebo effect was present, one would expect it to be
evenly distributed among all patients and across different headache
diagnoses.
Our patients segregated into three groups following
withdrawal: one with improvement (45%); one that stayed completely
unchanged (48%); and a small group of 7% who deteriorated. Furthermore,
there were marked differences between the diagnostic groups with a 67%
median reduction in migraine, 0% in tension-type headache (TTH), 37% in
mixed migraine and TTH and 0% in other headache diagnoses. These results
strongly suggest the absence of a marked “inverse” placebo effect.
References
3. van der Kuy PH, Lohman JJ. A quantification of the placebo
response in migraine prophylaxis. Cephalalgia 2002;22:265-70.
4. Bendtsen L, Mattsson P, Zwart JA, Lipton RB. Placebo response in
clinical randomized trials of analgesics in migraine. Cephalalgia
2003;23:487-90.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.