We thank Bronstein and Chou for their interest in our article. They raise an important question: Was it the disease progression or the pharmacological treatment
that influenced proteasome 20S levels in our PD patients?
When we separately analyzed patients under
monotherapy with L-Dopa and patients treated with L-Dopa plus DA-agonists,
we found that patients under monotherapy had levels of proteasome 20S
activity (1.8 +/- 0.3 nmol) similar to those seen in controls (2.3 +/- 0.2
nmol; p=0.28). We concluded that the difference between treated PD
patients and the other groups was ascribable to the subgroup of patients
taking both L-Dopa and DA-agonists, who were also those with the longest
disease duration.
Based on our results and the assumption that
the reduction in proteasome activity was due to the pharmacological
treatment, it could also be assumed that DA-agonists were solely responsible. In our opinion, such a conclusion cannot be drawn
without further investigation particularly when we consider the bulk of
data suggesting a neuroprotective effect for this class of compounds. [4,5]
Moreover, we did not find a significant correlation between disease
duration and total dose of medication (r=0.19; p=0.31).
However, high levels of
dopamine represent a favorable condition for a defective regulation of
proteasomal activity and possibly the formation of intracellular
inclusions. [6,7] For this reason, we are now testing the effects of dopamine on proteasome 20S and caspase
activity in isolated human lymphocytes from normal subjects. Preliminary
results seem to indicate a dose-dependent, inhibitory effect of
dopamine on proteasomal activity. If confirmed, the
hypothesis of a pharmacological origin for the proteasome 20S deficiency
found in treated PD patients would be further supported.
Regarding the concept that a central, biochemical defect may play a
causative and constant role is doubtful considering the progressive nature
of PD. Neurochemical,
neuroanatomical, electrophysiological changes accompany the evolution of
the disease. Recently it has been demonstrated in a rodent model that with chronic MPTP administration, MPTP-
induced proteasomal impairment evolves with time. [8]
References
4. Schapira AH. Neuroprotection and dopamine agonists. Neurology
2002; 58(4 Suppl 1):S9-18.
5. Marek K, Jennings D, Seibyl J. Dopamine agonists and Parkinson's
disease progression: what can we learn from neuroimaging studies. Ann
Neurol 2003; 53 Suppl 3:S160-S166.
6. Keller JN, Huang FF, Dimayuga ER, Maragos WF. Dopamine induces
proteasome inhibition in neural PC12 cell line. Free Radic Biol Med 2000;
29:1037-1042.
7. Yoshimoto Y, Nakaso K, Nakashima K. L-dopa and dopamine enhance
the formation of aggregates under proteasome inhibition in PC12 cells.
FEBS Lett 2005; 579:1197-1202.
8. Fornai F, Schluter OM, Lenzi P, et
al. Parkinson-like syndrome induced by continuous MPTP infusion:
convergent roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and alpha-synuclein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:3413-3418.
Disclosure: The author reports no conflicts of interest.