We read with interest Dr. Jeret’s comments on our article. Although
beyond the scope of our article, he raises the interesting but difficult
topic of risk/benefit of anticoagulation in patients with MBs. Based on
the histologic data available on MBs, [3] there is a reason to suggest that
MBs could predict future intracranial hemorrhages. This currently remains a hypothesis to be tested and proven.
Six studies
have examined the influence of MBs on the future risk of stroke, four in
Asian populations [4-7] and only two in Caucasian populations. [8,9] The
methods of analysis and the numbers of outcomes in these studies precluded
a thorough analysis of future risk stratified by differences in drug
treatment. No prospective study has ever assessed whether the risk of
future intracranial hemorrhages in people treated with antiplatelet agents
or anticoagulants is raised by the presence of MBs.
As underlined by Dr
Jeret, decision of treatment with anticoagulants, but also with
antiplatets or thrombolytic agents, is difficult. Although MBs might be
biomarkers of increased fragility of intracranial arteries, this has not
been proven. Based on current evidence, there is no reason to preclude
treatment with anticoagulants in the presence of MBs.
Regarding the second
point raised by Dr Jeret, our study pointed out that
MBs are also frequent in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s
disease and we interpreted this result as underlining the importance of
vascular pathology in neurodegenerative processes. There is no data
supporting that having MBs increases the likelihood of cognitive
dysfunction; MBs are found in other non-dementing disorders too
(Rendu-Osler; postraumatic; various cerebrovascular disorders). We hope
our study has fuelled the interest and study into the clinical impact of
MBs.
References
3.Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Roob G, et al. Histopathologic analysis of
foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2*-weighted MR images in patients
with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence of microangiopathy-
related microbleeds. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology 1999;20:637-
642.
4.Fan YH, Zhang L, Lam WWM, Mok VCT, Wong KS. Cerebral microbleeds as
a risk factor for subsequent intracerebral hemorrhages among patients with
acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:2459-2462.
5.Imaizumi T, Horita Y, Hashimoto Y, Niwa J. Dotlike hemosiderin
spots on T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of stroke
recurrence: a prospective study. Journal of Neurosurgery 2004;101:915-920.
6. Tsushima Y, Aoki J, Endo K. Brain microhemorrhages detected on T2*-
weighted gradient-echo MR images. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology
2003;24:88-96.
7. Naka H, Nomura E, Takahashi T, et al. Combinations of the presence
or absence of cerebral microbleeds and advanced white matter
hyperintensity as predictors of subsequent stroke types. AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol 2006;27:830-835.
8.Greenberg SM, Eng JA, Ning M, Smith EE, Rosand J. Hemorrhage burden
predicts recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage after lobar hemorrhage. Stroke
2004;35:1415-1420.
9.Boulanger JM, Coutts SB, Eliasziw M, et al. Cerebral
microhemorrhages predict new disabling or fatal strokes in patients with
acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2006;37:911-
914.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.