Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS:
Marc Gotkine, Yakov Fellig, and Oded Abramsky
Occurrence of CNS demyelinating disease in patients with myasthenia gravis
Neurology 2006; 67: 881-883
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
Occurrence of CNS demyelinating disease in patients with myasthenia gravis
Brian G. Weinshenker, Anu Jacob
(4 December 2006)
Occurrence of CNS demyelinating disease in patients with myasthenia gravis
Ken Ikeda, Yo Araki, and Yasuo Iwasaki.
(4 December 2006)
Occurrence of CNS demyelinating disease in patients with myasthenia gravis
Ilya Kister, Joseph Herbert, Michael L. Swerdlow, Roberto Bergamaschi, Giovanni Piccolo and Joel Oger
(4 December 2006)
Reply from the Authors
Marc Gotkine, Oded Abramsky
(4 December 2006)
Occurrence of CNS demyelinating disease in patients with myasthenia gravis
4 December 2006
Brian G. Weinshenker, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine W8B,Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,200 First St SW ,Rochester MN 55905 USA, Anu Jacob
We read with interest the article by Gotkine et al who suggest an
association between myasthenia gravis(MG), "CNS-specific demyelinating
disease" and a "forme fruste of SLE", in a series of five patients. [1] We
suggest a more specific neurological diagnosis for these patients.
Patients 1, 3, and 5 had MG, ANA, and subsequently presented with
myelitis or recurrent myelitis. Patient 1, a 28-year-old woman had two
episodes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM, initially
from C4 to C6; subsequently from C2 to T10) with edema and
enhancement. The brain MRI was normal. This description is more consistent
with the newly recognized neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum of
disorders. [2]
NMO (also known as optic-spinal MS or Devic’s disease) is an
idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the CNS characterized by
LETM and optic neuritis (ON), and usually has a relapsing course. 'Mixed'
CSF pleocytosis, as in this case, occasionally with neutrophil
predominance, absence of oligoclonal bands, and lack of brain lesions on
MRI are typical. Relapsing optic neuritis or relapsing myelitis, often
represent limited forms of the NMO phenotype ("NMO spectrum disorders")
and a high proportion of these cases are seropositive for the NMO-specific
autoantibody, NMO-IgG, which is directed at the astrocytic water channel
protein aquaporin-4. [3] The sensitivity of NMO-IgG for the diagnosis of NMO
is 73 percent and specificity 90 percent. Its sensitivity for relapsing
LETM is 52% for first event LETM is 40%. [2,3] In a prospective study of
patients who experienced a first event LETM, NMO-IgG seropositivity
predicted with greater than 50% certainty recurrence of LETM or
development of ON within one year. [2] NMO is recognized to be associated
with other autoimmune disorders in up to 40 percent of cases. Its
association with MG has been documented in several reports. [4]
None of the patients in this report seem to satisfy the ARA
criteria for SLE. ANA is non-organ-specific autoantibody associated with a
variety of immune reactions. Our group recently reported that patients
with NMO spectrum disorders who are seropositive for NMO-IgG have a higher
rate of seropositivity for ANA and SSA/SSB antibodies than those who are
seronegative for NMO-IgG. [5] We suggest that the diagnosis
suggested by Gotkine et al of a "CNS-specific demyelinating disorder",
occurring with MG and a "forme fruste of SLE" is most likely an NMO
spectrum disorder. Testing for NMO-IgG would be helpful for diagnosis and
prognosis.
References
1. Gotkine M, Fellig Y, Abramsky O. Occurrence of CNS demyelinating
disease in patients with myasthenia gravis. Neurology 2006;67:881-883.
2. Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, Vukusic S, et al. Neuromyelitis optica IgG predicts relapse after
longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Ann Neurol 2006;59:566-569.
3. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica:
distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004;364:2106-2112.
4. Kister I, Gulati S, Boz C, et
al. Neuromyelitis optica in patients with myasthenia gravis who underwent
thymectomy. Arch Neurol 2006;63:851-856.
5. Pittock SJ, Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Homburger HA, Lucchinetti
CF, Weinshenker BG. The prevalence of non-organ-specific autoantibodies
and NMO-IgG in neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and related disorders. Neurology
2006; 66(5 Suppl 2):A307.
Disclosure: Dr. Weinshenker will receive royalties related to a patent for NMO-IgG held by Mayo Medical Ventures. Dr. Jacob reports no conflicts of interest.
Occurrence of CNS demyelinating disease in patients with myasthenia gravis
4 December 2006
Ken Ikeda, Department of Neurology, PL Tokyo Health Care Center 16-1, Kamiyamacho, Shibuyaku, Tokyo, 150-0047, Japan, Yo Araki, and Yasuo Iwasaki.
We read with great interest the article by Gotkine et
al [1]
concerning occurrence of CNSDD and myasthenia gravis (MG). We also
encountered one patient with recurrent myelitis among 325 patients with
MG.
A 53-year-old woman was diagnosed as MG at age 29. Thymectomy
was performed at age 30 years and the pathologic finding revealed
hyperplasia. After she was treated with pyridostigmine and prednisolone
until age 42 years, MG was remitted completely without medication. Three
years later, she developed weakness and dysesthesisa in the upper limbs.
Cervical MRI showed T2-hyperintensity signal areas in the C2-6 segments
with enhancement. Methylprednisolone treatment improved motor and
sensory deficits without sequences. She experienced paresthesia ascending
from the lower limbs to body and upper limbs and painful tonic seizures in the upper limbs at age 51. Neurological examination showed
paresthesia and hyperreflexia in the four extremities and Lhermitte's
sign was
presented.
Immunological analyses showed negative acetylcholine receptor
antibodies and increased anti-nuclear antibodies. Brain MRI was normal.
Spinal MRI disclosed T2-hyperintensity signal areas in the C3-T1 segments
with ring-shaped enhancement. On visual evoked potentials, P100 latency
was delayed (115 msec in the right and 118 msec in the left). Two years
later, optic neuritis occurred. The final diagnosis of neuromyelitis
optica
(NMO) was made.
According to recent diagnostic criteria for NMO, [6] the features of spinal
MRI
reveal longitudinally extensive cord lesions more than three segments in our
and
four patients of Gotkine et al. [1] Those pathognomic distribution of spinal
lesions suggest a possibility of NMO. Gotkine et al [1] describe that
prolonged
visual evoked potentials in Patient 4. The first question is whether
visual
evoked potentials are performed in Patient 1, 3 and 5. The first question
is
whether visual evoked potentials are performed in the other four patients. We
would
like to know serum NMO-IgG antibodies in Patient 1 and 5 who have no
lesions on brain MRI. How is the possibility of NMO in those patients? NMO
is
associated in MG patients after thymectomy. [4,7] Besides NMO, recurrent
myelitis without optic neuritis could contribute to common immunological
mechanism as a subgroup of CNSDD in thymectomized MG patients.
References
6. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG.
Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2006; 66:
1485-1489.
7. Furukawa Y, Yoshikawa H, Yachie A, Yamada M. Neuromyelitis optica
associated with myasthenia gravis: characteristic phenotype in Japanese
population. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13: 655-658.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Occurrence of CNS demyelinating disease in patients with myasthenia gravis
4 December 2006
Ilya Kister, NYU/Hospital for Joint Diseases 301 East 17th Sreet, Suite 550, New York, NY 10003, Joseph Herbert, Michael L. Swerdlow, Roberto Bergamaschi, Giovanni Piccolo and Joel Oger
Gotkine et al [1] describe three patients with
myasthenia gravis (MG) who underwent thymectomy and subsequently developed
either recurrent or monophasic acute myelitis. The authors suggest that
these patients may have a "form fruste of SLE", given their elevated ANA
titers, though they have not exhibited any non-neurologic manifestations
of SLE and had no anti-ds DNA Ab in serum.
Alternatively, we would like to
propose that the three patients may have form fruste of Neuromyelitis Optica
(NMO). ANA positivity is not an infrequent finding in NMO [8] and would
not preclude this diagnosis. All three patients had extensile cord lesions three
or more vertebral segments in length, which are highly characteristic of
NMO; absence of MS-like plaques in brain and oligoclonal bands in CSF is
also suggestive of this disease. It would be interesting to examine the
patients for stigmata of past attacks of optic neuritis on neuro-ophthalmologic exam and on visual evoked potentials, as well as to test
their NMO IgG status.
We recently reported four patients with MG who underwent
thymectomy and developed clinically definite NMO; two of our four patients
had an elevation in ANA titers. [4]. Concurrently, Furukawa et al,
published two cases of MG followed by NMO: one patient had thymectomy prior
to NMO onset, while the other has been previously diagnosed with SLE [7].
There are presently no less than 13 reports in the literature of
thymectemized myasthenics developing NMO, or recurrent acute myelitis. [4,7,9 and references therein]. In all these cases, MG was diagnosed
prior to the first CNS event. Moreover, in all but one patient with
definite MG and NMO, thymectomy preceded NMO onset.
We agree with the conjecture of Gotkine et al that thymectomy may
lead to breakdown of self-tolerance thereby potentiating development of
autoimmune disease. A systematic analysis of long-term effects of
thymectomy is needed, using non-thymectomized myasthenics as controls, to
assess whether thymectomy indeed confers an increased risk of future
autoimmune disease and what the magnitude of the excess risk is.
It may also be worthwhile to investigate whether thymectomy predisposes to
development of NMO IgG autoantibodies even in the absence of clinical
manifestations of NMO.
References
8. Ghezzi A, Bergamaschi R, Martinelli V, et al. Clinical characteristics, course and prognosis of
relapsing Devic’s Neuromyelitis Optica. J Neurol 2004; 251:47-52.
9. Antoine J-C, Camdessanche J-P, Absi L, Lassabliere F, Feasson L. Devic disease and thymoma with anti-central nervous system and antithymus antibodies
Neurology 2004 62: 978-980.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Reply from the Authors
4 December 2006
Marc Gotkine, Department of Neurology, Hadassah University Hospital P.O. Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel, Oded Abramsky
We thank the authors for raising some important questions which
reiterate the importance of the discovery by Dr. Weinshenker's group of
the NMO-IgG and its value in defining patients with a distinct spectrum of
diseases.
We agree with Drs Weinshenker and Jacob, Dr. Ikeda et al and Dr.
Kister et al that the extensive longitudinal involvement of the spinal
cord with cord swelling is characteristic of the type of myelitis
occurring in patients with NMO-IgG. We also would point out that this
type of spinal cord lesion also occurs in patients with SLE. [10]
As SLE is a syndrome with clinical criteria we once again emphasize
that none of our patients had SLE (hence we defined the syndrome as a
"forme fruste") although we stand by our assertion that the neurological
involvement observed in some of our patients may be due to pathogenetic
mechanisms which also occur in SLE. [1]
Ikeda et al make a valid point regarding visual evoked potentials
(VEP). Although not fully detailed in our original paper these were normal
in patient 1 and abnormal in patients 3 and 4. Unfortunately patient 5 had
not performed a VEP test and was unavailable for further testing.
We are impressed by the close resemblance of clinical and laboratory
features between Dr. Ikeda's patient and our patient 1. The most
noteworthy difference is the clinical and electrophysiological evidence of
optic nerve dysfunction in Dr. Ikeda's patient whereas our patient 1 has
never suffered from visual symptoms and had normal visual evoked
potentials bilaterally. NMO-IgG has been reported in patients with MG with
classic NMO [4] but has not yet been documented in patients with MG and
isolated myelitis. Nevertheless, prior to the publication of our article
we sent serum from patient 1 (relapsing longitudinal myelitis) and patient
3 (relapsing localized myelitis) for NMO-IgG testing. Not surprisingly,
patient 1 (the patient discussed by Weinshenker and Jacob and Ikeda et
al) but not patient 3, tested positive for NMO-IgG.
Given that NMO occurs in patients with SLE [11] it is certainly
conceivable that the myelitis of SLE is closely related, if not part of
the NMO spectrum. As a corollary we hypothesize that systematic
investigation of SLE patients with longitudinal myelitis will reveal a
high proportion of patients with NMO-IgG.