We read the article by Yamamoto et
al who address the issue of the management of PD.[1] The large number of subjects and the conclusions are impressive. We have a few concerns with the design of the study.
The number of
subjects was not equal or similar among the treatment groups
(cabergoline-16, pramipexole-16, pergolide-66, past-treated-27). In addition, the
female/male ratio in the cabergoline and control groups was high in
comparison to the other groups and the illness duration of the patients who
received pramipexole was not significantly different from the control
group, while it was longer for the other groups. The duration of illness
is significantly higher in the pergolide and cabergoline treated groups
than the control group and the other two treatment groups. The patients in
these have had the disease for a significantly longer time than the
patients in the other two treatment groups.
The Hoehn and Yahr Score(HYS)
is high in the pergolide(2.6) and cabergoline-treated(2.63) groups
compared to the control group, while it is similar to the control group
in the other treatment groups and the duration of illness is lower in the
pramipexole group than the other groups.
The cumulative dose is low for the pramipexole group, although the
daily dose is in the therapeutic range. This is because the duration of
treatment is longer in the other groups. In the study by Murakami et
al [2], the low dose of pergolide is reported to be 1.5mg. In the
present study, the reported mean pergolide dose is 1.4mg. The 85 patients
in the control group were not treated for an average of five years, while
the HYS is relatively high(>2). We would like clarification about the follow-up in this study.
In reviewing the authors' references, we note that the study by
Van Camp et al is a study solely on pergolide [3], and the study by
Horvath et al [4] reports complications with the use of pergolide and
cabergoline together. There is no study on the monotherapy with
cabergoline or pramipexole in their references 8-11 or 13.
The cited study by
Dhawan et al [5] reports results on patients with previous
histories of congestive heart disease and hypertension and they did trans-thoracic echocardiography only on patients with complaints. Since
this study is not prospective, there is no information of the baseline
ECG, telecardiography, and trans-thoracic echocardiography of the
subjects. There is no information whether the patients had previous
cardiac disease.
Similar and more carefully designed studies are needed to address these concerns.
References
1. Yamamoto M, Uesugi T, Nakayama T. Dopamine agonists and cardiac
valvulopathy in Parkinson disease: A case–control study. Neurology 2006; 67: 1225–1229.
2. Murakami M, Mikami T, Kitaguchi M, et al. Effects of low-dose pergolide therapy on cardiac valves in patients with Parkinson's disease [in Japanese]. J Cardiol 2005;46:221–227.
3. Van Camp G, Flamez A, Cosyns B, Goldstein J, Perdaens C, Schoors
D. Heart valvular disease in patients with Parkinson's disease treated
with high-dose pergolide. Neurology 2003;61:859-861.
4. Horvath J, Fross RD, Kleiner-Fisman G, et al. Severe multivalvular heart disease: a new complication of the ergot derivative dopamine agonists. Move Disord 2004;19:656–662.
5. Dhawan V, Medcalf P, Stegie F, et al. Retrospective evaluation of cardio-pulmonary fibrotic side effects in symptomatic patients from a group of 234 Parkinson's disease patients treated with cabergoline. J Neural Transm 2005;112:661–668.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.