Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
ARTICLES:
D. Deplanque, I. Masse, C. Lefebvre, C. Libersa, D. Leys, and R. Bordet
Prior TIA, lipid-lowering drug use, and physical activity decrease ischemic stroke severity
Neurology 2006; 67: 1403-1410
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
Prior TIA, lipid-lowering drug use, and physical activity decrease ischemic stroke severity
Marc Gotkine, Israel Steiner
(4 December 2006)
Reply from the Authors
Dominique Deplanque, Isabelle Masse, Catherine Lefebvre, Christian Libersa, Didier Leys, Régis Bordet
(4 December 2006)
Prior TIA, lipid-lowering drug use, and physical activity decrease ischemic stroke severity
4 December 2006
Marc Gotkine, Neurology Department, Hadassah University Hospital, Ein Kerem (MG) and Mount Scopus (IS) Department of Neurology, Hadassah University Hospital, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel, Israel Steiner
We read with interest the article by Deplanque et al in which lipid-
lowering drugs (LLDs)were shown to be associated with decreased stroke
severity. [1] They concluded that this was likely due to the
neuroprotective effects of these drugs.
We proposed another mechanism that may explain these
findings: that hypercholesterolemia, by enhancing atherosclerosis and
chronically compromising blood tissue supply, could trigger local
compensatory mechanisms which ultimately reduce ischemia-induced tissue
injury. [2] This may increase the brain's tolerance to sudden disruption
of circulation and partially protect the tissue from acute ischemia.
High serum cholesterol levels are associated with less severe
presentation and improved short-term functional outcome in stroke patients. [3] Similar mechanisms may underlie the phenomenon of decreased stroke
severity in smokers [4] and of reduced myocardial injury following acute
myocardical infarction in angina sufferers. [5]
It is reasonable to assume that patients taking LLDs were more likely to
have been exposed to an extended period of hypercholesterolemia than those
never treated with LLDs. The apparent benefit of taking LLD’s prior
to an ischemic stroke may partially reflect adaptive-protective
mechanisms triggered by the preceding hypercholesterolemia rather than the
neuroprotective effects of the drugs themselves.
It would be interesting to know the pre-treatment cholesterol
levels of the LLD-treated patients compared to the pre-stroke
cholesterol levels of the untreated patients.
References
1. Deplanque D, Masse I, Lefebvre C, et al. Prior TIA, lipid-lowering
drug use, and physical activity decrease ischemic stroke severity.
Neurology 2006;67:1403-1410.
2. Steiner I, Biran I. Better outcome after stroke with higher serum
cholesterol levels. Neurology 2000;55:1941-1942.
3. Vauthey C, de Freitas GR, van Melle G, Devuyst G, Bogousslavsky J.
Better outcome after stroke with higher serum cholesterol levels.
Neurology 2000;54:1944-1949.
5. Anzai T, Yoshikawa T, Asakura Y, et al. Effect on short-term
prognosis and left ventricular function of angina pectoris prior to first
Q-wave anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74:
755–759.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Reply from the Authors
4 December 2006
Dominique Deplanque, Department of Pharmacology - EA 1046 Faculty of Medicine, F-59045 Lille, France, Isabelle Masse, Catherine Lefebvre, Christian Libersa, Didier Leys, Régis Bordet
d-deplanque{at}chru-lille.fr Dominique Deplanque, et al.
We thank Drs. Gotkine and Steiner for their comments on
our study. [1] We agree that aside from the potential neuroprotective effect
of LLDs in stroke, the mechanisms involved in the
development of a brain tolerance to ischemia must be identified.
Several studies have
discussed whether chronic hypercholesterolemia could induce such a
protective effect. [3,4] In Alzheimer’s disease, the results conflict; several studies suggest a deleterious effect of mid-life
hypercholesterolemia, while late-life hypercholesterolemia might have some
beneficial effects. [6] According to the methodology used
and delay between stroke onset and cholesterol measurements, the results vary which leads to misinterpretation. Our study was not designed to answer this question so conclusions can not be definitive.
Nevertheless, there is a growing body of evidence supporting the
hypothesis that brain can adapt to injuries such as cerebral ischemia. [1,7]
Experimental studies on preconditioning have shown that various
conditions can initiate reactions in cells and tissues that lead after
some time to neuroprotection. Although transient ischemia is typical of
preconditioning stimulus, ischemic tolerance could be induced by exposing
brain to various endogenous and exogenous stimuli (hypoxia, oxidative
stress, inflammatory cytokines, lipopolysaccharide, linolenic acid,
anesthetics) that converge downstream on fundamental mechanisms that
ultimately account for the protection. They are based on the enhancement
of cell survival through the modulation of various cellular and molecular
pathways including variations at gene level. [7] Given these data,
targeting mechanisms of cytoprotection is an important strategy for new
therapeutic approaches. Because physical activity and LLDs have previously
been experimentally demonstrated as possible inducers of brain ischemic
tolerance [8,9], our study suggests the possibility to develop a
prophylactic neuroprotection in humans. [1]
In addition to experimental studies examining brain ischemic tolerance
pathways, both physical activity and LLDs should now be prospectively
evaluated to determine whether they are effective to reduce the severity
of brain ischemia. The question of whether the decreased severity of
stroke in patients under LLDs is due to an increased brain tolerance
induced by LLDs themselves or by a chronically compromised blood tissue
supply as suggested by Drs Gotkine and Steiner can only be solved by
randomized controlled trials in patients with similar baseline cholesterol
levels.
According to a recent presentation of results from the SPARCL
trial, it seems that patients randomized in the statin arm have less
severe recurrent strokes. [10] The hypothesis of Drs. Gotkine and Steiner
is then unlikely to play an important role.
References
6.Mielke MM, Zandi PP, Sjogren M, et al. High total cholesterol
levels in late life associated with a reduced risk of dementia. Neurology
2005;64:1689-1695.
7.Gidday JM. Cerebral preconditioning and ischaemic tolerance. Nat
Rev Neurosci 2006;7:437-448.
8.Endres M, Gertz K, Lindauer U, et al. Mechanisms of stroke
protection by physical activity. Ann Neurol 2003;54:582-590.
9.Bordet R, Ouk T, Pétrault O, et al. PPAR: a new pharmacological
target for neuroprotection in stroke and neurodegenerative diseases. Bioch
Soc Trans 2006;34:1341-1346.
10.Goldstein LB and The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in
Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Investigators. The SPARCL trial: effect of
statins on stroke severity. Ann Neurol 2006;60(S10):S85.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.