We thank Dr. Alappat for his interest in our systematic review. [1] He refers to a single migration study
performed in London during the 10-year period 1979-1988 that determined a
patient’s ethnicity based on surnames. [3] We agree that this method of ethnic stratification is flawed. [4] Dr. Alappat’s comment also raises an important question concerning the best method to determine the ethnicity of an individual living
within a geographical region.
While there is evidence to support the accuracy of self-reported
ethnicity [5], recent advances in population genetics have lead to the
development of ethnic-specific genetic markers that can accurately
delineate a person’s ancestry. [6] The definitive method to determine the importance of ethnicity in ALS
is the performance of a large prospective study in a population
of mixed ethnicity. Increased worldwide migration patterns have resulted
in many racially admixed populations.
Although calculating ethnicity-based risk in such populations is complex, the availability of panels of
genetically characterized specific markers for some ancestral populations
will help to resolve the challenges and concerns raised by Dr. Alappat.
References
3. Elian M, Dean G. Motor neuron disease and multiple sclerosis among
immigrants to England from the Indian subcontinent, the Caribbean, and
east and west Africa. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:454–457.
4. Macfarlane GJ, Lunt M, Palmer B, Afzal C, Silman AJ, Esmail A.
Determining aspects of ethnicity amongst persons of South Asian origin:
the use of a surname-classification programme (Nam Pehchan). Public Health
2007;121:231-236.
5. Liu XQ, Paterson AD, John EM, Knight JA. The role of self-defined
race/ethnicity in population structure control. Ann Hum Genet 2006;70:496-505.
6. Rosenberg NA, Pritchard JK, Weber JL, et al. Genetic structure of human populations. Science 2002;298:2381-2385.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.