I read the article by Krarup et al. with great interest. [1] The definition of long-term outcome was only outlined in the abstract. Krarup et al.’s previous study—-the ExStroke Pilot Trial-- provided information in the Methods on when the PASE questionnaire was obtained (within 90 days, median 10 days). [2]
The authors appeared to have followed the subjects at earlier time intervals yet it would have been interesting to note when physical activity influenced the odds ratio of an increasing mRS after stroke. Table 2 and Figure 2 do not indicate how the variable mRS was treated, presumably as a binary categorical variable given the use of an OR. If so, it would have been helpful to see what the mRS cut-off points were to derive a “higher” level, and the rationale for that cut-off point.
Another helpful analysis could have used the change in mRS from the time immediately after stroke and 2 years. In light of other reports indicating exercise training may also improve recovery after stroke, analyzing the pattern of physical activity after enrollment could be an interesting corollary to this study. [3]
Krarup et al. have made an important contribution to the literature regarding pre-stroke level of functioning and stroke recovery. They have also confirmed the importance of physical activity not just in stroke onset prevention but in prevention of a more severe stroke and stroke recovery.
References
1. Krarup L-H, Truelsen T, Gluud C, et al. Prestroke physical activity is associated with severity and long-term outcome from first-ever stroke. Neurology 2008;71:1313-1318.
2. Krarup LH, Gluud C, Truelsen T, et al. The ExSTroke Pilot Trial: rationale, design, and baseline data of a randomized multicenter trial comparing physical training versus usual care after an ischemic stroke. Contemp Clin Trials 2008;29:410-417.
3. Mead GE, Greig CA, Cunningham I, et al. Stroke: a randomized trial of exercise or relaxation. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:892-899.
Disclosure: The author reports no disclosures.