Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain
A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Phantom limb and complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS1) are characterized by changes in cortical processing and organization, perceptual disturbances, and poor response to conventional treatments. Graded motor imagery is effective for a small subset of patients with CRPS1.
Objective: To investigate whether graded motor imagery would reduce pain and disability for a more general CRPS1 population and for people with phantom limb pain.
Methods: Fifty-one patients with phantom limb pain or CRPS1 were randomly allocated to motor imagery, consisting of 2 weeks each of limb laterality recognition, imagined movements, and mirror movements, or to physical therapy and ongoing medical care.
Results: There was a main statistical effect of treatment group, but not diagnostic group, on pain and function. The mean (95% CI) decrease in pain between pre- and post-treatment (100 mm visual analogue scale) was 23.4 mm (16.2 to 30.4 mm) for the motor imagery group and 10.5 mm (1.9 to 19.2 mm) for the control group. Improvement in function was similar and gains were maintained at 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion: Motor imagery reduced pain and disability in these patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I or phantom limb pain, but the mechanism, or mechanisms, of the effect are not clear.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Supplementary Material
File (e1.doc)
- Download
- 133.50 KB
References
1.
Janig W, Baron R. Complex regional pain syndrome: mystery explained? Lancet Neurol 2003;2:687–697.
2.
Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome. Pain 2004;108:192–198.
3.
Moseley GL. Is successful rehabilitation of complex regional pain syndrome due to sustained attention to the affected limb? A randomised clinical trial. Pain 2005;114:54–61.
4.
Harris AJ. Cortical origin of pathological pain. Lancet 1999;354:1464–1466.
5.
Acerra N, Moseley GL. Dysynchiria: watching the mirror image of the unaffected limb elicits pain on the affected side. Neurology 2005;65:751–753.
6.
McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Halligan PW, Blake DR. Referred sensations in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Rheumatology 2003;42:1067–1073.
7.
McCabe CS, Moseley GL. Functional strategies of restoration of complex regional pain syndrome. In: Justins D, ed. Refresher course syllabus (pain 2005—an updated review). Amsterdam: IASP Press, 2005.
8.
Moseley GL. Making sense of S1 mania—are things really that simple? In: Gifford L, ed. Topical Issues in Pain Volume 5. Falmouth: CNS Press, 2006:321–340.
9.
Bruehl S, Harden RN, Galer BS, et al. External validation of IASP diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome and proposed research diagnostic criteria. Pain 1999;81:147–154.
10.
Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998;27:331–338.
11.
Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, et al. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther 1997;77:820–829.
12.
Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 1987;30:191–197.
13.
McQuay HJ, Moore RA, Eccleston C, Morley S, Williams AC. Systematic review of outpatient services for chronic pain control. Health Technol Assess 1997;1:i–iv, 1–135.
14.
Forouzanfar T, Weber WEJ, Kemler M, van Kleef M. What is a meaningful pain reduction in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1? Clin J Pain 2003;19:281–285.
15.
Moseley GL. Why do people with CRPS1 take longer to recognise their affected hand? Neurology 2004;62:2182–2186.
16.
Flor H. The functional organization of the brain in chronic pain. Prog Brain Res 2000;129:313–322.
17.
McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Ring EFJ, Halligan PW, Wall PD, Blake DR. A controlled pilot study of the utility of mirror visual feedback in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1). Rheumatology 2003;42:97–101.
18.
Alexander GM, van Rijn MA, van Hilten JJ, Perreault MJ, Schwartzman RJ. Changes in cerebrospinal fluid levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in CRPS. Pain 2005;116:213–219.
19.
Forouzanfar T, Koke AJA, van Kleef M, Weber WEJ. Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I. Eur J Pain 2002;6:105–122.
20.
Wasner G, Schattschneider J, Binder A, Siebrecht D, Maier C, Baron R. Recent trends in understanding and therapy of complex regional pain syndromes. Anaesthesist 2003;52:883–895.
21.
McBride A, Atkins R. Complex regional pain syndrome. Curr Orthopaedics 2005;19:155–165.
22.
Moerman DE, Jonas WB. Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:471–476.
23.
Juottonen K, Gockel M, Silen T, Hurri H, Hari R, Forss N. Altered central sensorimotor processing in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Pain 2002;98:315–323.
24.
Flor H, Denke C, Schaefer M, Grusser S. Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain. Lancet 2001;357:1763–1764.
25.
Forderreuther S, Sailer U, Straube A. Impaired self-perception of the hand in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Pain 2004;110:756–761.
26.
MacLachlan M, McDonald D, Waloch J. Mirror treatment of lower limb phantom pain: a case study. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:901–904.
27.
Srinivasan AV, Velmurugendran UC, Nadu T, Ramachandran RD, Ramachandran VS. Allesthesia and extinction of referred sensations after brachial plexus avulsion. Neurology 1998;50:A256–A256.
28.
Birklein F. Complex regional pain syndrome. J Neurology 2005;252:131–138.
29.
Beniczky S, Tajti J, Varga ET, Vecsei L. Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain syndromes. J Neural Transm 2005;112:735–749.
30.
Moseley GL, Schweinhardt P, Wise R, Tracey I. Virtual, imagined and mirror movements—a novel approach to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS1). In: Europ Fed IASP Chapt Triennial Conference; Prague, Czech Republic; 2003.
31.
Parsons LM. Integrating cognitive psychology, neurology and neuroimaging. Acta Psychol 2001;107:155–181.
32.
Schwoebel J, Coslett HB, Bradt J, Friedman R, Dileo C. Pain and the body schema: effects of pain severity on mental representations of movement. Neurology 2002;59:775–777.
33.
Nico D, Daprati E, Rigal F, Parsons L, Sirigu A. Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. Brain 2004;127:120–132.
34.
Moseley GL, Sim DF, Henry ML, Souvlis T. Experimental hand pain delays recognition of the contralateral hand—evidence that acute and chronic pain have opposite effects on information processing? Cogn Brain Res 2005;25:188–194.
35.
Hudson ML, McCormick K, Zalucki N, Moseley GL. Expectation of pain replicates the effect of pain in a hand laterality recognition task: bias in information processing toward the painful side? Eur J Pain 2006;10:219–224.
36.
Galer BS, Jensen M. Neglect-like symptoms in complex regional pain syndrome: results of a self-administered survey. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999;18:213–217.
37.
Moseley GL. Distorted body image in complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Neurology 2005;65:773.
38.
Gandevia S, Phegan C. Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation. J Phys (Lond) 1999;514:609-616.
39.
Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, et al. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 1995;375:482–484.
40.
Maihofner C, Handwerker HO, Neundorfer B, Birklein F. Patterns of cortical reorganization in complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology 2003;61:1707–1715.
41.
Pleger B, Tegenthoff M, Schwenkreis P, et al. Mean sustained pain levels are linked to hemispherical side-to-side differences of primary somatosensory cortex in the complex regional pain syndrome I. Exp Brain Res 2004;155:115–119.
42.
Flor H. Cortical reorganisation and chronic pain: implications for rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:66–72.
43.
Pleger B, Tegenthoff M, Ragert P, et al. Sensorimotor returning in complex regional pain syndrome parallels pain reduction. Ann Neurol 2005;57:425–429.
44.
Gandevia S. Kinesthesia: roles for afferent signals and motor commands. In: Rothwell L, Shepherd J, eds. Handbook of physiology, section 12, exercise: regulation and integration of multiple systems. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996:128–172.
45.
McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Halligan PW, Blake DR. Simulating sensory-motor incongruence in healthy volunteers: implications for a cortical model of pain. Rheumatology 2005;44:509–516.
46.
Moseley GL, McCormick K, Hudson M, Zalucki N. Disrupted cortical proprioceptive representation evokes symptoms of peculiarity, foreignness and swelling, but not pain. Rheumatology 2006;45:196–200.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006.
Publication History
Published online: November 2, 2006
Published in print: December 26, 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited By
- Breaking the Cycle of Pain: The Role of Graded Motor Imagery and Mirror Therapy in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Biomedicines, 12, 9, (2140), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12092140
- Exploring Facial Somatosensory Distortion in Chronic Migraine: The Role of Laterality and Emotion Recognition—A Cross-Sectional Study, Applied Sciences, 14, 18, (8102), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188102
- Supplementary motor area is deactivated during mental rotation tasks with biomechanical constraints in fMRI, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1455587
- “What Keeps Me up at Night”: Complications in Foot and Ankle Surgery, JBJS Journal of Orthopaedics for Physician Assistants, 12, 3, (e24.00012), (2024).https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.JOPA.24.00012
- Differences in Response Rates to Mental Rotation Tasks-Focusing on Individual Factorsメンタルローテーション課題における反応速度の違い, Journal of allied health sciences, 15, 2, (69-75), (2024).https://doi.org/10.15563/jalliedhealthsci.15.69
- Effectiveness of motor imagery in complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review with meta‐analysis , Pain Practice, 24, 5, (760-771), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13348
- Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation, a novel approach for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: case series, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, (1-15), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2393213
- Feasibility study of a home-based graded motor imagery intervention (GraMI protocol) for amputees with phantom limb pain, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, (1-11), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2349759
- The multidisciplinary team in the management of chronic pain and pain-related fear: an evidence-based approach in a clinical case, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, (1-18), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2336099
- Phantomschmerzen: gegenwärtige Behandlungsstrategien, Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date, 19, 03, (249-269), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2177-7974
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
The neurology.org payment platform is currently offline. Our technical team is working as quickly as possible to restore service.
If you need immediate support or to place an order, please call or email customer service:
- 1-800-638-3030 for U.S. customers - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
- 1-301-223-2300 for customers outside the U.S. - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
- [email protected]
We appreciate your patience during this time and apologize for any inconvenience.