Medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment
Abstract
Objectives: To empirically assess the capacity of patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to consent to medical treatment under different consent standards (Ss).
Methods: Participants were 56 healthy controls, 60 patients with MCI, and 31 patients with mild Alzheimer disease (AD). Each participant was administered the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI) and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Group differences in performance on the CCTI and neuropsychological variables were examined. In addition, the capacity status (capable, marginally capable, or incapable) of each MCI participant on each CCTI standard was examined using cut scores derived from control performance.
Results: Patients with MCI performed comparably to controls on minimal consent standards requiring merely expressing a treatment choice (S1) or making the reasonable treatment choice [S2], but significantly below controls on the three clinically relevant standards of appreciation (S3), reasoning (S4), and understanding (S5). In turn, the MCI group performed significantly better than the mild AD group on [S2], S4, and S5. Regarding capacity status, patients with MCI showed a progressive pattern of capacity compromise (marginally capable and incapable outcomes) related to stringency of consent standard.
Conclusions: Patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) demonstrate significant impairments on clinically relevant abilities associated with capacity to consent to treatment. In obtaining informed consent, clinicians and researchers working with patients with MCI must consider the likelihood that many of these patients may have impairments in consent capacity related to their amnestic disorder and related cognitive impairments.
GLOSSARY: AD = Alzheimer disease; ADRC = Alzheimer's Disease Research Center; CCTI = Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument; CVLT-II = California Verbal Learning Test, second edition; DRS-2 = Dementia Rating Scale, 2nd edition; GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; MDC = medical decision-making capacity; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; Ss = consent standards; WAIS-III = Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, third edition; WMS-III = Wechsler Memory Scale, third edition; WMS-R = Wechsler Memory Scale, revised edition; WRAT-3 = Wide Range Achievement Test, third edition.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
REFERENCES
1.
Marson DC, Ingram K, Cody H, Harrell LE. Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer's disease under different legal standards. Arch Neurol 1995;52:949–954.
2.
Grisso T. Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments. New York: Plenum Press; 1986.
3.
Kim SYH, Karlawish JHT. Ethics and politics of research involving subjects with impaired decision-making abilities. Neurology 2003;62:1645–1646.
4.
Petersen RC, Morris JC. Mild cognitive impairment as a clinical entity and treatment target. Arch Neurol 2005;62:1160–1163.
5.
Burns A, Zaudig M. Mild cognitive impairment in older people. Lancet 2002;360:1963–1965.
6.
Petersen RC, Thomas RG, Grundman M, et al. Vitamin E and donepezil for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2379–2388.
7.
Moye J, Karel MJ, Azar AR, Gurrera RJ. Capacity to consent to treatment: Empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementia. Gerontologist 2004;44:166–175.
8.
Karlawish JHT, Casarett DJ, James BD, Xie SX, Kim SYH. The ability of persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) to make a decision about taking an AD treatment. Neurology 2005;64:1514–1519.
9.
Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1985–1992.
10.
Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet 2006;367:1262–1270.
11.
McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984;34:939–944.
12.
Griffith HR, Dymek MP, Atchison P, Harrell LE, Marson DC. Medical decision-making in neurodegenerative disease: mild AD and PD with cognitive impairment. Neurology 2005;65:483–485.
13.
Dymek MP, Marson DC, Harrell LE. Factor structure of capacity to consent to medical treatment in patients with Alzheimer's disease: an exploratory study. J Forens Neuropsychol 1999;1:27–48.
14.
Marson DC, Chatterjee A, Ingram K, Harrell LE. Towards a neurologic model of competency: cognitive predictors of capacity to consent in Alzheimer's disease using three different legal standards. Neurology 1996;46:666–672.
15.
Tepper A, Elwork A. Competency to consent to treatment as a psycholegal construct. Law and Human Behavior 1984;8:205–223.
16.
Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological Assessment. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
17.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98.
18.
Jurica PJ, Leitten CL, Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale. 2nd ed. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2001.
19.
Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised edition. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1987.
20.
Wechsler D. WMS-III: Wechsler Memory Scale–3rd edition. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
21.
Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983.
22.
Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
23.
Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Test. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2000.
24.
Royall DR, Cordes JA, Polk M. CLOX: An executive clock-drawing task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:588–594.
25.
Wang PL, Ennis KE. The cognitive competency test. Toronto: Mt. Sinai Hospital Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1986.
26.
Reitan R, Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson: Neuropsychology Press; 1993.
27.
Wechsler D. WAIS-III: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–3rd edition. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
28.
Wilkinson G. Wide Range Achievement Test Administration Manual. 3rd ed. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range Incorporated; 1993.
29.
Yesavage J. Geriatric depression scale. Psychopharmacol Bull 1988;24:709–713.
30.
Nygard L. Instrumental activities of daily living: a stepping-stone towards Alzheimer's disease diagnosis in subjects with mild cognitive impairment? Acta Neurol Scand 2003;107(suppl 179):42–46.
31.
Griffith HR, Belue K, Sicola A, et al. Impaired financial abilities in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2003;60:449–457.
32.
Masur DM, Sliwinski M, Lipton RB, Blau AD, Crystal HA. Neuropsychological prediction of dementia and the absence of dementia in healthy elderly persons. Neurology 1994;44:1427–1432.
33.
Ganguli M, Dodge HH, Shen C, DeKosky ST. Mild cognitive impairment, amnestic type: an epidemiologic study. Neurology 2004;63:115–121.
34.
Mello MM, Studdert D, Brennan TA. The rise of litigation in human subjects research. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:40–45.
35.
Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Mentally ill and non-mentally ill patients' abilities to understand informed consent disclosure for medication. Law Hum Behav 1991;15:377–388.
36.
Taub H, Kline G, Baker M. The elderly and informed consent: Effects of vocabulary level and corrected feedback. Exp Aging Res 1991;17:137–146.
37.
Mittal D, Palmer B, Dunn L, et al. Comparison of two enhanced consent procedures for patients with mild Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2007;15:163–167.
38.
Fitten LJ, Lusky R, Hamann C. Assessing treatment decision-making capacity in elderly nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:1097–1104.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007.
Publication History
Published online: October 8, 2007
Published in print: October 9, 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited By
- Decision-making under uncertainty in healthy and cognitively impaired aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 129, (105643), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2024.105643
- Cognitive, Emotional, and Daily Functioning Domains Involved in Decision-Making among Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review, Brain Sciences, 14, 3, (278), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14030278
- An Inclusive Model for External Human Machine Interfaces of Autonomous Vehicles, 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), (1-6), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS59971.2024.10555718
- Increased reliance on heuristic thinking in mild cognitive impairment, Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, (1-16), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2024.2405506
- Mild Cognitive Impairment is Associated with Poorer Everyday Decision Making, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 94, 4, (1607-1615), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230222
- Shared decision making in mild cognitive impairment, Neurology Clinical Practice, 9, 2, (160-164), (2023)./doi/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000576
- Patients with multiple sclerosis choose a collaborative role in making treatment decision: results from the Italian multicenter SWITCH study, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 70, (104474), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.104474
- Development of clinical vignettes to assess healthcare decision-making capacity in elderly with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease, European Review of Applied Psychology, 73, 3, (100799), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2022.100799
- Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment before Prostate Cancer Treatment, Cancers, 14, 5, (1355), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051355
- Patterns of impairment in decision-making capacity in Alzheimer’s disease and its relationship with cognitive and clinical variables, Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 3, (271-278), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2021-2180
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
The neurology.org payment platform is currently offline. Our technical team is working as quickly as possible to restore service.
If you need immediate support or to place an order, please call or email customer service:
- 1-800-638-3030 for U.S. customers - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
- 1-301-223-2300 for customers outside the U.S. - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
- [email protected]
We appreciate your patience during this time and apologize for any inconvenience.