Effect of clopidogrel with aspirin on functional outcome in TIA or minor stroke
CHANCE substudy
Abstract
Objective:
We compared the effect of clopidogrel plus aspirin vs aspirin alone on functional outcome and quality of life in the Clopidogrel in High-risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial of aspirin-clopidogrel vs aspirin alone after acute minor stroke or TIA.
Methods:
Participants were assessed at 90 days for functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and quality of life using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). Poor functional outcome was defined as mRS score of 2–6 at 90 days and poor quality of life as EQ-5D index score of 0.5 or less.
Results:
Poor functional outcome occurred in 254 patients (9.9%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group, as compared with 299 (11.6%) in the aspirin group (p = 0.046). Poor quality of life occurred in 142 (5.5%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 175 (6.8%) in the aspirin group (p = 0.06). Disabling stroke at 90 days occurred in 166 (6.5%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 219 (8.5%) in the aspirin group (p = 0.01). In stratified analysis by subsequent stroke, there was no difference in 90-day functional outcome and quality of life between the 2 groups.
Conclusions:
In patients with minor stroke or TIA, the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin appears to be superior to aspirin alone in improving the 90-day functional outcome, and this is consistent with a reduction in the rate of disabling stroke in the dual antiplatelet arm.
Classification of evidence:
This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute minor stroke or TIA, clopidogrel plus aspirin compared to aspirin alone improves 90-day functional outcome (absolute reduction of poor outcome 1.70%, 95% confidence interval 0.03%–3.42%).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Supplementary Material
REFERENCES
1.
Kleindorfer D, Panagos P, Pancioli A, et al. Incidence and short-term prognosis of transient ischemic attack in a population-based study. Stroke 2005;36:720–723.
2.
Coull AJ, Lovett JK, Rothwell PM. Population based study of early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: implications for public education and organisation of services. BMJ 2004;328:326.
3.
Johnston SC, Gress DR, Browner WS, Sidney S. Short-term prognosis after emergency department diagnosis of TIA. JAMA 2000;284:2901–2906.
4.
Coutts SB, Modi J, Patel SK, et al. What causes disability after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke? Results from the CT and MRI in the Triage of TIA and minor Cerebrovascular Events to Identify High Risk Patients (CATCH) Study. Stroke 2012;43:3018–3022.
5.
Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2197–2223.
6.
Yang G, Wang Y, Zeng Y, et al. Rapid health transition in China, 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013;381:1987–2015.
7.
Wang Y, Claiborne Johnston S. Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the effects of a 3-month clopidogrel-aspirin regimen versus aspirin alone for the treatment of high-risk patients with acute nondisabling cerebrovascular event. Am Heart J 2010;160:380–386.
8.
Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, et al. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2013;369:11–19.
9.
Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, et al. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training: NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke 1994;25:2220–2226.
10.
Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2007;369:283–292.
11.
van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–607.
12.
Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001;33:337–343.
13.
Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005;43:203–220.
14.
Christensen MC, Mayer S, Ferran JM. Quality of life after intracerebral hemorrhage: results of the Factor Seven for Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke (FAST) trial. Stroke 2009;40:1677–1682.
15.
University of Nottingham. Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency After Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS). Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01661322. Accessed July 3, 2013.
16.
Saver JL, Gornbein J. Treatment effects for which shift or binary analyses are advantageous in acute stroke trials. Neurology 2009;72:1310–1315.
17.
Hankey GJ. Dual antiplatelet therapy in acute transient ischemic attack and minor stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;369:82–83.
18.
Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, et al. Platelet-oriented inhibition in new TIA and minor ischemic stroke (POINT) trial: rationale and design. Int J Stroke 2013;8:479–483.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Academy of Neurology.
Publication History
Received: November 23, 2014
Accepted: April 16, 2015
Published online: July 17, 2015
Published in print: August 18, 2015
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.
Study Funding
Supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China. The grant no. is 2008ZX09312-008, 2011BAI08B02, 2012ZX09303, and 200902004.
Authors
Author Contributions
Yongjun Wang, S. Claiborne Johnston, Yilong Wang, X.Q. Zhao, and C.X. Wang conceived and designed the study. X.W. Wang and Yilong Wang interpreted analysis of the data and prepared the report. Yongjun Wang, S. Claiborne Johnston, Ying Xian, B. Hu, and David Wang contributed to comments on the draft manuscript and revised the report. Yilong Wang and L.P. Liu coordinated the study. Xia Meng, X.W. Wang, and A.X. Wang oversaw subject recruitment and monitored gathering clinical data. B. Hu, H. Li, and J.M. Fang conducted the statistical analysis.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited By
- Intravenous thrombolysis versus dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute minor ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1377475
- Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with favorable outcome in acute minor stroke with an onset-to-door time beyond 24 h, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 123, 4, (501-509), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2023.09.017
- Early ischemic stroke predictors after transient ischemic attacks among Egyptians, Tanta Medical Journal, 51, 2, (132-138), (2023).https://doi.org/10.4103/tmj.tmj_72_22
- Multiple Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Already on Antiplatelet Agents Based on the Linked Big Data for Stroke, Journal of Korean Medical Science, 38, 38, (2023).https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e294
- IV Thrombolysis vs Early Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Mild Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke, Neurology, 101, 9, (e933-e939), (2023)./doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207538
- Empiric treatment with aspirin and ticagrelor is the most cost-effective strategy in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack, International Journal of Stroke, 19, 2, (209-216), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930231202374
- Intravenous thrombolysis versus antiplatelet therapy in minor stroke patients with large vessel occlusion, CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 29, 6, (1615-1623), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.14124
- Factors related to unfavorable outcome in minor ischemic stroke, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 32, 8, (107203), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107203
- Factors affecting self-reported bleeding acceptance in acute ischemic stroke survivors on various types of antithrombotic therapy, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 32, 1, (106894), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106894
- Optimising the analysis of vascular prevention trials: Re-Assessment of the TARDIS trial, the first prevention trial to adopt an ordinal primary outcome measure, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 35, (101186), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101186
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
The neurology.org payment platform is currently offline. Our technical team is working as quickly as possible to restore service.
If you need immediate support or to place an order, please call or email customer service:
- 1-800-638-3030 for U.S. customers - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
- 1-301-223-2300 for customers outside the U.S. - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
- [email protected]
We appreciate your patience during this time and apologize for any inconvenience.
I read the substudy from the CHANCE trial by Wang et al., [1] in which they concluded the combination of aspirin-clopidogrel improves the 90-day functional outcome as compared to aspirin alone, showing an absolute risk reduction of 1.7% and number needed to treat (NNT) of 59. The result is encouraging, but there are some issues to consider.
First, there is no biological mechanism of antiplatelet agents explaining better functional outcome aside from stroke prevention. The stratified analysis by groups with and without recurrent stroke fails to show a differential effect, excluding stroke prevention as explanation.
Second, these exploratory analyses were not factored in the sample size calculation and not powered for. [2,3] Thus, the alternative interpretation is the results reflected the effect of chance.
In addition, considering the confidence intervals, it would be useful to know the NNT and its range. For this study in average and for the purpose of improving functional outcome, we need to treat 59 patients to benefit one. However, the number can be as low as 29 and as high as 3762 patients raising the question of what is the NNT threshold at which a treatment should be considered clinically, as opposed to statistically, significant.
1. Wang X, Zhao X, Johnston SC, et al. Effect of clopidogrel with aspirin on functional outcome in TIA or minor stroke: CHANCE substudy. Neurology 2015;85:573-579.
For disclosures, please contact the editorial office at [email protected].