Skip to main content
AAN.com
Brief Communications
September 24, 2002
Letter to the Editor

How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study

September 24, 2002 issue
59 (6) 947-949

Abstract

The presence of contrast enhancement in a brain tumor is often regarded as a sign of malignancy. The authors identified 314 patients with malignant and low-grade supratentorial glial neoplasms in an unselected population, 58 of which lacked contrast enhancement on preoperative neuroimaging. Nonenhancing gliomas were malignant in approximately one third of cases, especially in older patients. Histologic confirmation of the diagnosis is therefore important in all patients suspected of harboring a primary glial neoplasm.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Chamberlain MC, Murovic JA, Levin VA. Absence of contrast enhancement on CT brain scans of patients with supratentorial malignant gliomas. Neurology . 1988; 38: 1371–1374.
2.
Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Martinez AJ. Unreliability of contemporary neurodiagnostic imaging in evaluating suspected adult supratentorial (low-grade) astrocytoma. J Neurosurg . 1993; 79: 533–536.
3.
Perez-Cruet MJ, Adelman L, Anderson M, Roth PA, Ritter AM, Saris SC. CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of nonenhancing brain lesions. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg . 1993; 61: 105–117.
4.
Mihara F, Numaguchi Y, Rothman M, Kristt D, Fiandaca M, Swallow L. Non-enhancing supratentorial malignant astrocytomas: MR features and possible mechanisms. Radiat Med . 1995; 13: 11–17.
5.
Perry JR, Tien RD, McLendon RE, Rasheed K, Brown MT. Argument for stereotactic biopsy of suspected low-grade glioma: results from 53 nonenhancing lesions. Neurology . 1996; 46: A158.Abstract.
6.
Barker FG II, Chang SM, Huhn SL, et al. Age and the risk of anaplasia in magnetic resonance-nonenhancing supratentorial cerebral tumors. Cancer . 1997; 80: 936–941.
7.
Ginsberg LE, Fuller GN, Hashmi M, Leeds NE, Schomer DF. The significance of lack of MR contrast enhancement of supratentorial brain tumors in adults: histopathological evaluation of a series. Surg Neurol . 1998; 49: 436–440.
8.
Lee Y-Y, Van Tassel P. Intracranial oligodendrogliomas: imaging findings in 35 untreated cases. Am J Neuroradiol . 1989; 10: 119–127.
9.
Knopp EA, Chas S, Johnson G, et al. Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. Radiology . 1999; 211: 791–798.
10.
Marks JE, Gado M. Serial computed tomography of primary brain tumors following surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy. Radiology . 1977; 125: 119–125.
Letters to the Editor
20 December 2002
correction of a statistic
raphael petit, intern of neurology

This article states that, "We found that 9% of nonenhancing gliomas were malignant whereas others have reported higher rates (14-45%)" . It seems to be false : 9% of malignant gliomas were nonenhancing or 21/58 (36.2%) of nonenhancing gliomas were malignant ; the same rate as the other.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Neurology®
Volume 59Number 6September 24, 2002
Pages: 947-949
PubMed: 12297589

Publication History

Received: January 18, 2002
Accepted: June 5, 2002
Published online: September 24, 2002
Published in issue: September 24, 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations & Disclosures

J. N. Scott, MD
From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (Drs. Scott and Sevick), Epidemiology, Prevention and Screening, Alberta Cancer Board and Community Health Sciences (Dr. Brasher), Clinical Neurosciences and Anatomy (Dr. Sevick), Pathology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Rewcastle), and Oncology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Forsyth), University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Tom Baker Cancer Centre; and Department of Medicine (Drs. Scott, Sevick, and Rewcastle), Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
P. M.A. Brasher, PhD
From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (Drs. Scott and Sevick), Epidemiology, Prevention and Screening, Alberta Cancer Board and Community Health Sciences (Dr. Brasher), Clinical Neurosciences and Anatomy (Dr. Sevick), Pathology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Rewcastle), and Oncology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Forsyth), University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Tom Baker Cancer Centre; and Department of Medicine (Drs. Scott, Sevick, and Rewcastle), Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
R. J. Sevick, MD
From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (Drs. Scott and Sevick), Epidemiology, Prevention and Screening, Alberta Cancer Board and Community Health Sciences (Dr. Brasher), Clinical Neurosciences and Anatomy (Dr. Sevick), Pathology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Rewcastle), and Oncology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Forsyth), University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Tom Baker Cancer Centre; and Department of Medicine (Drs. Scott, Sevick, and Rewcastle), Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
N. B. Rewcastle, MD
From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (Drs. Scott and Sevick), Epidemiology, Prevention and Screening, Alberta Cancer Board and Community Health Sciences (Dr. Brasher), Clinical Neurosciences and Anatomy (Dr. Sevick), Pathology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Rewcastle), and Oncology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Forsyth), University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Tom Baker Cancer Centre; and Department of Medicine (Drs. Scott, Sevick, and Rewcastle), Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
P. A. Forsyth, MD
From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (Drs. Scott and Sevick), Epidemiology, Prevention and Screening, Alberta Cancer Board and Community Health Sciences (Dr. Brasher), Clinical Neurosciences and Anatomy (Dr. Sevick), Pathology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Rewcastle), and Oncology and Clinical Neurosciences (Dr. Forsyth), University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Tom Baker Cancer Centre; and Department of Medicine (Drs. Scott, Sevick, and Rewcastle), Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Notes

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. P. Forsyth, Department of Medicine, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29 Street NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N2; e-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited By
  1. multiPI-TransBTS: A multi-path learning framework for brain tumor image segmentation based on multi-physical information, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 191, (110148), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110148
    Crossref
  2. Diagnostic performance of multiparametric nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in grading glioma and correlating IDH mutation status, Clinical Radiology, 82, (106791), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.106791
    Crossref
  3. 3D MRI Brain Tumor Diagnosis with Topological Descriptors, Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, (81-94), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76160-7_8
    Crossref
  4. Decoding Glioblastoma Heterogeneity: Neuroimaging Meets Machine Learning, Neurosurgery, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003260
    Crossref
  5. Beyond conventional imaging: Advancements in MRI for glioma malignancy prediction and molecular profiling, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 112, (63-81), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2024.06.004
    Crossref
  6. Prediction of TERT mutation status in gliomas using conventional MRI radiogenomic features, Frontiers in Neurology, 15, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1439598
    Crossref
  7. The Current Diagnostic Performance of MRI-Based Radiomics for Glioma Grading: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 23, 5, (2024).https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin2305100
    Crossref
  8. The Utility of Spectroscopic MRI in Stereotactic Biopsy and Radiotherapy Guidance in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma, Tomography, 10, 3, (428-443), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography10030033
    Crossref
  9. Fully automated MR-based virtual biopsy of primary CNS lymphomas, Neuro-Oncology Advances, 6, 1, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae022
    Crossref
  10. Multiparametric MRI and T2/FLAIR mismatch complements the World Health Organization 2021 classification for the diagnosis of IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-co-deleted/ATRX-mutant astrocytoma, Clinical Radiology, 79, 3, (197-204), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.016
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

The neurology.org payment platform is currently offline. Our technical team is working as quickly as possible to restore service.

If you need immediate support or to place an order, please call or email customer service:

  • 1-800-638-3030 for U.S. customers - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
  • 1-301-223-2300 for customers outside the U.S. - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
  • [email protected]

We appreciate your patience during this time and apologize for any inconvenience.

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and Supplementary Material

Full Text

View Full Text

Full Text HTML

View Full Text HTML

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share