The influence of right frontotemporal dysfunction on social behavior in frontotemporal dementia
Abstract
Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is associated with a variety of cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions. Symptoms may be influenced by the relative involvement of the right versus the left hemisphere, with left-sided FTD manifesting language changes and right-sided FTD presenting with aggressive, antisocial, and other socially undesirable behaviors.
Objective: To test the hypothesis that right-sided FTD is associated with socially undesirable behavior.
Methods: The authors assessed 41 patients with FTD diagnosed by the new research criteria for FTD1 including behavioral, neuropsychologic, and neurologic testing as well as SPECT and MRI. Based on visual inspection of SPECT scans, 12 patients were classified as having predominantly right-sided and 19 patients were classified as having predominantly left-sided FTD. A clinician blinded to the imaging data reviewed medical records to tabulate the frequency of the following socially undesirable behaviors: criminal behavior, aggression, loss of job, alienation from family/friends, financial recklessness, sexually deviant behavior, and abnormal response to spousal crisis.
Results: Eleven of 12 right-sided and 2 of 19 left-sided FTD patients had socially undesirable behavior as an early presenting symptom (χ = 23.3, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The authors conclude that right-sided frontotemporal degeneration is associated with socially undesirable behavior. The early presence of socially undesirable behavior in FTD differentiates right-sided from left-sided degeneration. The results highlight the importance of the right hemisphere, especially frontotemporal regions, in the mediation of social behavior. The potential mechanism for these social losses with right-sided disease is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology . 1998; 51: 1546–1554.
2.
Pick A. On the relationship between aphasia and senile atrophy of the brain. In: Rottenberg D, Hochberg FH, eds. Neurological classics in modern translation. New York: Hafner Press, 1977: 35–40.
3.
Brun A. Frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type. I. Neuropathology. Arch Gerontol Geriatr . 1987; 6: 193–208.
4.
Neary D, Snowden JS, Northen B, et al. Dementia of frontal lobe type. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1988; 51: 353–361.
5.
Kluver H, Bucy PC. Preliminary analysis of functions of the temporal lobes in monkeys. Arch Neurol Psychiatry . 1939; 42: 979–1000.
6.
Miller BL, Ikonte C, Cummings JL, et al. Evaluation of the Lund Manchester criteria for frontotemporal dementia. Neurology . 1996; 46: A185.
7.
Snowden JS, Neary D, Mann DMA, et al. Progressive language disorder due to lobar atrophy. Ann Neurol . 1992; 31: 174–183.
8.
Hodges JR, Patterson K, Oxbury S, et al. Semantic dementia. Progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain . 1992; 115: 1783–1806.
9.
Edwards–Lee T, Miller BL, Benson DF, et al. The temporal lobe variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain . 1997; 120: 1027–1040.
10.
Kanno I, Uemura K, Miura S, et al. HEADTOME: a hybrid emission tomograph for single photon and positron emission imaging of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1981; 5: 216–226.
11.
Neirinckx RD, Cannig LR, Piper IM. A new radiopharmaceutical for SPECT. Imaging regional cerebral blood perfusion. J Nucl Med . 1987; 28: 191–202.
12.
Tucker DM, Luu P, Pribram KH. Social and emotional self-regulation. Ann NY Acad Science . 1995; 769: 213–239.
13.
Borod JC, Koff E, Lorch MP, et al. Channels of emotional expression in patients with unilateral brain damage. Arch of Neurol . 1985; 42: 345–348.
14.
DeKosky ST, Heilman KM, Bowers D, et al. Recognition and discrimination of emotional faces and pictures. Brain Lang . 1980; 9: 206–214.
15.
Etcoff NL. Selective attention to facial identity and facial emotion. Neuropsychologia . 1984; 22: 281–295.
16.
Bowers D, Bauer RM, Coslett HB, et al. Processing of faces by patients with unilateral hemisphere lesions: I. Dissociation between judgments of facial affect and facial identity. Brain Cogn . 1985; 4: 258–272.
17.
Cicone M, Wapner W, Gardner H. Sensitivity to emotional expressions and situations in organic patients. Cortex . 1980; 16: 145–158.
18.
Strauss E, Moscovitch M. Perception of facial expressions. Brain Lang . 1981; 13: 308–332.
19.
Borod JC. Interhemispheric and intrahemispheric control of emotion: a focus on unilateral brain damage [special section: The emotional concomitants of brain damage]. J Consul Clin Psych . 1992; 60: 339–348.
20.
Bryden MP, MacRae L. Dichotic laterality effects obtained with emotional words. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol . 1988; 1: 171–176.
21.
Ley RG, Bryden MP. A dissociation of right and left hemispheric effects for recognizing emotional tone and verbal content. Brain Cogn . 1982; 1: 3–9.
22.
Safer MA, Leventhal H. Ear differences in evaluating emotional tones of voice and verbal content. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform . 1977; 3: 75–82.
23.
Heilman KM, Scholes R, Watson RT. Auditory affective agnosia: disturbed comprehension of affective speech. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1975; 38: 69–72.
24.
Tucker DM, Watson RT, Heilman KM. Discrimination and evocation of affectively intoned speech in patients with right parietal disease. Neurology . 1977; 27: 947–958.
25.
Ross ED. The aprosodias: functional–anatomic organization of the affective components of language in the right hemisphere. Arch Neurol . 1981; 38: 561–569.
26.
Ross ED, Mesulam MM. Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody and emotional gesturing. Arch Neurol . 1979; 36: 144–148.
27.
Sackheim H, Gur RCJ, Saney MC. Emotions are expressed more intensely on the left side of the face. Science . 1978; 202: 434–436.
28.
Heilman KM. Attentional asymmetries. In: Davidson RJ, Hugdahl K, eds. Brain asymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995: 228–230.
29.
Miller BL, Chang L, Mena I, et al. Clinical and imaging features of right focal frontal lobe degenerations. Dementia . 1993; 4: 204–213.
30.
Luria AR. The working brain. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
31.
Stuss DT, Benson DF. The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press, 1986.
32.
Stuss DT. Disturbance of self-awareness after frontal system damage. In: Prigatano GP, Schacter DL, eds. Awareness of deficit after brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991: 63–83.
33.
Wheeler MA, Stuss DT, Tulving E. Toward a theory of episodic memory: the frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness. Psychol Bull . 1997; 121: 331–354.
34.
Tulving E. Memory and consciousness. Can Psychol . 1985; 26: 1–12.
35.
Levine B, Black SE, Cabeza R, et al. Episodic memory and the self in a case of isolated retrograde amnesia. Brain . 1998; 121: 1951–1973.
36.
Shallice T, Burgess PW. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain . 1991; 114: 727–741.
37.
Cabeza R, Nyberg L. Imaging cognition: an empirical review of PET studies with normal subjects. J Cog Neuroscience . 1997; 9: 1–26.
38.
Nyberg L. Mapping episodic memory. Behav Brain Research . 1998; 90: 107–114.
39.
Nyberg L, Cabeza R, Tulving E. PET studies of encoding and retrieval: the HERA model. Psychonomic Bull Rev . 1996; 3: 135–148.
40.
Fink GR, Markowitsch HJ, Reinkemeier M, et al. Cerebral representation of one’s own past: neural networks involved in autobiographical memory. J Neurosci . 1996; 16: 4275–4282.
41.
Tulving E, Kapur S, Craik FI, et al. Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA . 1994; 91: 2016–2020.
42.
Tulving E. Brain/mind correlates of human memory. In: Sabourin M, Craik FIM, Robert M, eds. Advances in psychological science. Biological and cognitive aspects, vol. 2. Hove, England: Psychology Press, 1998: 441–460.
43.
Craik FIM, Moroz TM, Moscovitch M, et al. In search of the self: a positron emission tomography study. Psych Sci . 1999; 10: 26–34.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2001.
Publication History
Published online: June 12, 2001
Published in print: June 12, 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited By
- Examining Frontal Lobe Asymmetry and Its Potential Role in Aggressive Behaviors in Early Alzheimer’s Disease, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 98, 2, (539-547), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-231306
- A Scoping Review of Ethical and Legal Issues in Behavioural Variant Frontotemporal Dementia, Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 6, 2, (120-132), (2023).https://doi.org/10.7202/1101133ar
- The risk of criminal behavior in the elderly and patients with neurodegenerative disease, Brain and Crime, (181-196), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821375-9.00004-9
- Applications of fMRI to Neurodegenerative Disease, Functional Neuroradiology, (819-860), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10909-6_36
- Neuropsychiatric symptoms and imbalance of atrophy in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, Human Brain Mapping, 44, 15, (5013-5029), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26428
- Prosopagnosia, Other Specific Cognitive Deficits, and Behavioral Symptoms: Comparison between Right Temporal and Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia, Vision, 6, 4, (75), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6040075
- Behavioral disturbances in dementia, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 5, 1, (49-59), (2022).https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2003.5.1/fmuellerspahn
- Dynamic Aphasia as a Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia, Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 34, 4, (303-318), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000289
- Multimodal neurocognitive markers of naturalistic discourse typify diverse neurodegenerative diseases, Cerebral Cortex, 32, 16, (3377-3391), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab421
- The multidimensionality of abstract concepts: A systematic review, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 127, (474-491), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.004
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
The neurology.org payment platform is currently offline. Our technical team is working as quickly as possible to restore service.
If you need immediate support or to place an order, please call or email customer service:
- 1-800-638-3030 for U.S. customers - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
- 1-301-223-2300 for customers outside the U.S. - 8:30 - 7 pm ET (M-F)
- [email protected]
We appreciate your patience during this time and apologize for any inconvenience.